Looking at a mid-Sep delivery date (approx 4 weeks after deposit taken). A week of riding around and then straight into a century sportive, with a ferry booked the following day to Zeebrugge. Kind of essential it all fits and works as expected.
I've always used a B17 Standard (saddle), but have been curious about the narrower saddles. Nothing wrong with the B17, but unless you try something else you don't know what you're missing (or not!). Given the cost of Brooks saddles, it's a bit of a leap of faith I've not yet justified. I've finally found a plausable explanation of the purpose/fit of the B17, Team Pro and Swift saddles. It's plausable to me because of the different contact areas used in the various positions of upright/leant over/almost prone. I get the 'sit bones' measurement and it does make sense for the upright/touring position, where you do literally sit on the saddle, but what about fast-touring or long distance racing?
NOTE: this is just a 'plausable' explanation, I don't suggest it is actually true or what Brooks would admit to (they seem vague, probably for marketing reasons).
B17 suits bars above the saddle riding
Team Pro suits bars level or slightly below the saddle
Swift suits bars below the saddle
What I've taken this to mean, when looking at Thorn's equally loose definitions are : B17 = relaxed, Team Pro = sporty, Swift = racing. My Club Tour has been spec'd as 'fairly sporty' (you select this on the order form), so I've ordered a Team Pro saddle. I will have my existing B17 as a backup and a baseline, but it will be good to experiment with the Team Pro. I'll also try dropping the bars quite a bit, and see what effect that has on the feel of the Team Pro and see if I can find a point where it becomes uncomfortable.
cheers,