Hi Dan is that front derailleur a little high?
Hi Pete!
I didn't do the installation (just posted the photos), but jags reports good luck with it and smooth shifting and operation. Part of it could be camera angle or the geometry of the front mech's parallelogram.
Generally, I prefer the bottom edge of my front derailleur's cage to clear the top of the large chainring by ~1mm at the closed part of its swing, allowing for chainring and BB spindle runout. When the derailleur cage is centered on the large 'ring, then clearance is much greater, or course.
When I had my Sherpa, I noticed Thorn had set up my front derailleur with
considerably more clearance (necessitated so the derailleur mounting clamp could clear the seat tube bottle boss) and to my surprise, all worked out very nicely with extremely reliable, crisp, and clean front shifting with no overshifts or chain spills -- functionally perfect. I've noticed more front derailleurs on recent bikes sitting "high" compared to older standards, and they seem to work fine also. Perhaps it has something to do with the shifting pins and ramps on modern front chainrings and the shaped and contoured cages on current front derailleurs, designed to work with indexed shifting. I know my old, plain 'rings and flat-cage front mechs designed in the days of friction shifting weren't so tolerant and needed tight clearances to work as reliably.
All the best,
Dan.