We speak often of what fabulous engineering the Rohloff gearbox is. The point of modern engineering is interchangeability. Yet we have a good deal of correspondence on how Rohloffs differ in, for instance, the noise in various gears. And there is the infamous one per cent that requires adjustment at the factory. On the other hand, Rohloff gearboxes, once they work, have a reputation of working forever with minimal maintenance, and to be hardy even in the presence of neglect.
The Rohloff punctilio thus appears to be more the kind practised by artisan fitters and turners, giving each gearbox a slightly different character. Nothing wrong with that, of course; people pay extra for that sort of special craftsmanship; my Bentleys were none the worse for being substantially handmade (and I'm on record as saying that any modern Dagenham Ford is damned good car, because it is). Sorry for the car analogy, but it is what made even a short journey in a Bentley an occasion whereas the Porsche I drove for many years as a young man were (after the 356) merely tools of transport. A ride on a Rohloff-equipped bike is similarly an occasion and likely to remain so forever whereas a ride on the best Shimano Nexus (the fully-auto Di2 Cyber Nexus (1)) soon became just exercise.
It would be interesting to hear from those with two or more Rohloffs in the family, or those who got a second Rohloff in quick succession to the first one, if they notice differences in character.
Andre Jute
(1) Description of Di2 Cyber Nexus autobox and electronic adaptive suspension at:
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/BICYCLE%20%26%20CYCLING.html