Was it a good idea? I'm undecided! it is noticeably more comfortable off road, though just as noticeably slower on road. Tyres have remained Almotions, 700 x 40 to 650 x 55.
Do you attribute 650B being slower on road to the smaller wheel size or the fatter tyre?
I don't know if it's possible to separate those out, the overall diameter difference is 8mm, the width 15mm and the pressure approx 20psi.
I'm sure the gap could be closed by narrowing those differences, but then I suspect that'd take me be back to square one. Plus the price of decent tyres! I'm not buying any more till I've worn a few out, I think I may have enough to last this lifetime.
The difference would be quite significant if I were to use the bikes for the same purpose. I had cause to ride the same 95km road route twice last week, mostly lanes of varying surface, undulating but not particularly hilly, very similar weather conditions, same time of day, quite roads with little traffic. Thu on the Nomad 18.1kmh, Sun on the Mercury 20.9. Half an hour on a touring ride makes no difference to me, and hour on a 200km ride would.
The farm track/bridleway in the above photo was ridden at about the same speed I would a country lane on any bike, I'd have ridden it on the Mercury, but more cautiously and picking the line rather than ploughing through the puddles, on the 700c Nomad somewhere between the two. It was a lot more fun on bouncy tyres!
I don't know, I'm just musing, I haven't reached any conclusions, when I do it's be more about the rides than the stats.