Author Topic: Surly Ogre  (Read 6927 times)

KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Surly Ogre
« on: August 28, 2022, 10:27:17 PM »
Has anyone had this bike ? How does it compare to a Nomad ?

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2022, 11:19:06 PM »
Yes.
It's a bit heavier.
I could give you a detailed review if you like, but as the above fact is usually high on your list, I'd be surprised if you wanted any more.


CycleTourer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2022, 11:44:23 AM »
The Ogre frame has some downsides compared to the Nomad Mk3 frame. For example, Surly doesn't close the holes in the tubes that let out gas during the welding process, so water could get in.

Also, the chain-tensioning on the Ogre requires the Surly Tuggnut, and ideally two of those heavy and expensive items if you are installing the QR version of the Rohloff instead of the axle-nut version. Furthermore, the right seatstay on the Ogre has no splitter to allow a belt drive.

One upside of the Ogre in today’s world where many cyclists are doing bikepacking, is that the Ogre fork has three places for holders on each side. The Nomad Mk3 bikepacking fork only accommodates one holder on either side.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2022, 12:28:48 PM by CycleTourer »

KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2022, 04:53:46 PM »
Yes.
It's a bit heavier.
I could give you a detailed review if you like, but as the above fact is usually high on your list, I'd be surprised if you wanted any more.

. I was told it's lighter my Nomad  is 17kg & the new Ogre is 14.2 kg ?

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2022, 06:09:23 PM »
I was told it's lighter my Nomad  is 17kg & the new Ogre is 14.2 kg ?
Both of those can be true. But not if you compare like with like. You could build a 14.2kg Nomad or a 17kg Ogre.
I've just swapped the Ogre for a Nomad, here it is
IMG_20220807_124312

Most of the stuff swapped straight over, mudguards are new, stem is longer, same model of tyres but 40mm instead of 2".
I also have some new digital luggage scales, tested with some known weights and more accurate at these weights than using the bathroom scales.
Ogre (XL) 16.7kg
Nomad (61L) 15.8kg - I included the unfitted light, but haven't subtracted the bit to come off the steerer. Unlike the photos - weighed with the same pedals.

Half that difference is the tyres and tubes, but the Ogre is designed around bigger tyres, I tried it with the 40mm's and it wasn't pleasant.

Weight and the peripheral differences CycleTourer highlights aside, they're quite different bikes.  They ride different, sure there's plenty of overlap, the Ogre a better bike off road, the Nomad better on, you could do the same rides on either, though the choice of which is better would depend on your use.

But if your objective is a lighter bike, for when you have to lift it, this isn't it. I may have said this once or twice before - The weight difference between steel touring bikes is minimal, a few 100g's at most, the rest is in the build.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2022, 06:12:57 PM by PH »

KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2022, 08:00:51 PM »
Thank you very much for taking the time for the info , The Shand Tam looks like a good  option & Standforth is local to me ,I wonder if there is a lighter version of the Ryde Andra rims ?

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2022, 08:29:31 PM »
Thank you very much for taking the time for the info , The Shand Tam looks like a good  option & Standforth is local to me ,I wonder if there is a lighter version of the Ryde Andra rims ?
You're welcome.
I've just replied to another post of yours, we seem to be having the same conversation across several threads.
Shand bikes look nice, I considered a different model before getting a Mercury, but the Thorn geometry suited me better.  They custom build so maybe you could get something a bit lighter, but the stock build won't be significantly so, they're still building that model as an expedition tourer, though Reynolds 853 will be a gauge thinner than Thorn's 969.
Standforth?  Not one I heard of unless you meant Stanforth?  If the latter, the couple of bikes I've seen from them have been gorgeous, well worth having a chat with, though again I'd be surprised if there was a significant weight saving. The Kibo expedition model isn't hugely dissimilar to a Nomad and the Conway frameset (Non Rohloff, though they could probably do one) is similar to a Mercury.
Rims - Yes if you decide you don't need bombproof there's considerable savings to be made. I went for the Ryde 321's with are 180g each lighter than the Andra 30's.  If I hadn't originally built them for the Ogre, I'd probably have used DT Swiss which are another 100g each lighter.



KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2022, 10:51:36 PM »
Yes Stanforth , I like the fact they build a frame to suite .

KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2022, 10:59:47 AM »
My thinking behind the Ogre is that the Disc wheels are very easy to take off compared to the rim brake front wheel I have on my Nomad making it a lot easier to lift onto my Van rack & assemble. The Stans no tube rims  are half the weight of the Andra rims .

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2022, 08:58:33 PM »
My thinking behind the Ogre is that the Disc wheels are very easy to take off compared to the rim brake front wheel I have on my Nomad making it a lot easier to lift onto my Van rack & assemble. The Stans no tube rims  are half the weight of the Andra rims .
You've brought this front wheel issue up before, is it the tyre too wide to get between the blocks?  It ought not to be a problem with most tyres and brakes.
The rear wheel removal is easier with a Thorn than a Ogre, not that it's hard, it just takes a bit more effort.  You have to move the wheel a smidge forward to unhook the chain before sliding it back.  If you have mudguards, you also have to negotiate the wheel past them, I like mine fairly close fitting, which means the wheel doesn't fit unless the tyre is deflated. Also note that with sliding dropouts, you have to reposition the brake and the Rohloff Torque plate retaining nut whenever you tension the chain, this isn't a big deal, it just lacks the simplicity of an EBB.
I'm assuming your Nomad is 26" wheel?  What size were you thinking of for an Ogre? Be careful you make a proper comparison of the weights, wheels, tyres and tubes, the larger size has to eat up some of the potential savings.  Would you be better of looking for a Troll and keeping the wheel size?  I know they've been discontinued, but there's a few still in stock, or there's always secondhand (Though you want one of the more recent ones) I've never ridden one, but from what i understand the differences between the Troll and Ogre are mostly wheel size.  But again, sorry, the weight difference is going to be slight and I wouldn't know which is lighter.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2022, 09:45:14 PM by PH »

KDean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2022, 01:03:21 AM »
Yes I was using a 2.4" on the front ,& had to let the tyre down , the rear had a disc & wasn't a problem .I might look at Stan's no tube rims as they are half the weight of the Andra ,but I'm I'm going to see what can be built around the Ogre frame with various components & also see what Stanforth come up with .I like a larger wheel for the long rides I do .

DIAGMONKEY

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #11 on: October 16, 2022, 09:20:39 AM »
PH How does the Nomad compare to the Mercury in terms of feel and ride comfort?

Ta!

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2022, 11:29:34 PM »
PH How does the Nomad compare to the Mercury in terms of feel and ride comfort?

Ta!
A bit early for a definitive answer, the Nomad is currently on 400 miles, no ride over 50 miles and no camping yet.  Initial impressions are that they're what you'd expect:
Unloaded the Mercury feels sharper and livelier, more comfortable, I don't like loading it up, even a pannier of shopping can make it feel like the tail is wagging the dog. Loaded the Nomad is as steady as a rock, but it loses a bit of comfort unloaded and the higher BB does give a feeling of sat on, rather than in. There is a large overlap between the bikes, many of my rides could be done on either, though I knew that before I got the Nomad.
I can only talk about my experience with my bikes, I'm 95kg and ride a 610L, other people's experience and bikes are likely to be different. I think my Nomad is going to prove itself a better all rounder, the Mercury is likely to remain my favorite. I haven't ruled out changing the Nomad to 650B wheels, though I have about 10.000 miles worth of tyres to wear out before making that decision. 

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2022, 11:33:28 PM »
The Ogre frame has some downsides compared to the Nomad Mk3 frame. For example, Surly doesn't close the holes in the tubes that let out gas during the welding process, so water could get in.
A bit late to influence the OP, but having just noticed this I'll point out that the Nomad also has some unsealed vent holes.

CycleTourer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: Surly Ogre
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2022, 04:49:27 AM »
A bit late to influence the OP, but having just noticed this I'll point out that the Nomad also has some unsealed vent holes.

On the Nomad Mk3? I am currently a few hundred km from my own, so I can’t check. But I remember when I got the Nomad Mk3 frame and began building up a bike, I didn’t notice the same holes as on the Surly frame I had built up for someone just before.