Hey Dave,
Thanks for posing the question to the officials at Rohloff. That is neat that you have friends working at the company!
That is a very satisfying answer as to the purpose of the silent ring; I can clearly imagine in my head what is being explained. And it seems to answer the second question as well, despite the misinterpretation. No need for the silent ring in gears 1, 2, 4, 8, 9 and 11 clearly indicates that these gears (the only ones that make use of that particular clutch ring) are 1:1 with sun gear 3 which then makes the silent ring not needed. Whereas the other gears always need the dampening, since that particular clutch is always engaged and when ring gear 2 is not 1:1, all the other gear combos are overun by sun gear 3.
It is nice to know that the official Rohloff shifting shaft video is in fact a bit misleading. But of course this raises another question; Why does the ring gear 1 clutch have a retracted mode? Maybe the mirror-image construction of the twin planet carrier dictates which features are dominant in determining gear ratio, and maybe that dominance switches as seen in the difference in the ring gear 1 side (dominant clutch ring that truly disengages with slave pawls vs. the ring gear 2 side (slave clutch that is always engaged with dominant pawls)? Any thoughts on that Dave? Why else would Rohloff go through the trouble of engineering in and machining another ramp into the shifting axle for the ring gear 1 clutch?
And by the way, let me know if you're still enjoying the conversation. I could go back and forth about such things for awhile.
I thought it was odd that I did not notice extra pedaling noise during my tests, but then I was not expecting louder pedaling noises. Now that I know what to look for, I think I'll strip it down again and have another listen w/o the silent ring.