Author Topic: future rohloff?  (Read 3018 times)

riptoff

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
future rohloff?
« on: October 07, 2006, 04:47:37 pm »
Thr late FJ Camm, editor of Practical Mechanics/Wireless/ Television, brother of Sydney Camm who designed the Hurricane WW2 fighter was a keen cyclist and suggested that the best place for gears was the bottom bracket. How about a Rohloff system in the B/b?
Advantages would be many- weight centralised, short cable run inside tubing, simple chaincase or shaft drive, possible coaster brake incorporated, easy lube down seat tube, and I am sure many others.
 

Andrew

  • Guest
Re: future rohloff?
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2006, 06:07:02 am »
quote:
Originally posted by riptoff

Thr late FJ Camm, editor of Practical Mechanics/Wireless/ Television, brother of Sydney Camm who designed the Hurricane WW2 fighter was a keen cyclist and suggested that the best place for gears was the bottom bracket. How about a Rohloff system in the B/b?
Advantages would be many- weight centralised, short cable run inside tubing, simple chaincase or shaft drive, possible coaster brake incorporated, easy lube down seat tube, and I am sure many others.



http://www.g-boxx.com/