Hello!
My Club Tour is for camping/touring with rear panniers. I hesitate to ask, but what miniscule loads are carried by those who say the Audax is suitable for touring? Also the rear bags need to be far back to avoid heel hitting. Then of course the front of the bike leaps from the ground! If proper diligence is applied to a camping load, maybe but only maybe for one nights equipment. Bed and breakfast touring maybe but I doubt personally full camping touring...
I have (sorry jags) three Thorn Audax Mk3 bikes and one is winter use and one is summer use. The other is undecided but it does have 32 mm tyres fitted.....
All in all the bikes are great but for their intended purpose, which is lightweight fast sporty riding!
My opinion but I hope a genuine one.
Best regards,
John
Hi Anto
I am sure you won't get better advice than John has provided here, John has more experience riding (and lots of touring) various Thorn bikes than anybody I can think of on these boards.
I'm really not sure why you want a super fast climber for a touring bike while you have your Raleigh for fast day rides? But, with a Club Tour you could have a second pair of lightweight wheels for when you are not touring, as per the brochure in the old days people would race on their tourers at weekends.
I don't have personal experience of a Club Tour or a Sherpa, but I would put money on the Club Tour to be lighter and faster than your Sherpa, and a better climber. It won't be quite as responsive as an Audax but IMO the versatility for touring AND recreational riding outweighs that.
Maybe John could add a comparison of his Sherpa against his Club Tours?Sorry to cloud the issue for you Anto, but Club Tour gets my vote.
Jim