Author Topic: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement  (Read 4500 times)

in4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1785
Re: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2024, 11:00:37 PM »
I didn’t know there was a difference between the MK2 and MK3 bottom brackets. I’ll have to check it out. Personally I’ve been quite happy with my MK2 Nomad. I knew exactly what I was buying and where I intended to ride it. Originally I thought a 565L was the best fit but I opted for the 590L with a slightly shorter stem. Yes, it’s a tank of a bike but having confidence that it’s not going to fail in some remote corner of wherever is a big consideration for me. Coincidentally I was in a well known store today. They were selling a decently equipped tourer for circa £1.2k It would probably be OK for say a LEJOG but it was a pale comparison frame wise to a steel Nomad. You pays your money…

WorldTourer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2024, 01:26:09 AM »
I didn’t know there was a difference between the MK2 and MK3 bottom brackets.

The difference is in the EBB shell. On the Nomad Mk2, the EBB is fixed in place by two screws biting into the soft metal of the shell. This makes the shell a wearable part and one has to be careful not to create a continuous groove in the shell. On the Mk3, the design was changed so that the screws simply tighten the frame around the shell so it stays in place, without affecting the shell in any way.

in4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1785
Re: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2024, 11:34:29 AM »
Thanks for the explanation. Sounds vaguely similar to one made by Bushnell ( not sure ) Seem to recall someone remarking how creaky that one was. Glad yours is working well. Thanks again

PH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2367
Re: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2024, 12:05:49 PM »
Thanks for the explanation. Sounds vaguely similar to one made by Bushnell ( not sure ) Seem to recall someone remarking how creaky that one was. Glad yours is working well. Thanks again
No, very different to a Bushnell, my experience of that was indeed creaky and it's a common complaint, along with them having a tendency to seize if not serviced.
The newer Thorn type is a clamp design, think how the seatpost clamps in the frame and you have the basic idea. It's pretty much a bombproof design. Probably more importantly, it's foolproof.
That was the problem with the set screw type, issues were usually caused by unnecessarily small adjustment leading to indents not being sufficiently spaced to avoid slipping.  I made this mistake on my first, and needed a replacement, once I'd worked out how to use it there's no reason for it not to last a lifetime. 

in4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1785
Re: Mercury Mk 2 frame replacement
« Reply #19 on: June 30, 2024, 03:03:05 PM »
Found it!