Apparently METL is not so new, despite the Kickstarter promoter's huffing and puffing in the article linked above. METL (Martensite Elasticized Tubular Loading -- which describes a function of operation of a superelastic metal rather than a material -- the actual material is called Nitinol for nickel-titanium-[invented at]) was invented by "the Naval Ordnance Laboratory, in 1959 (so, yeah, technically space age, if very Space Age 1.0)." See the article from which that quote comes for much more:
https://www.bicycling.com/news/a35980528/smart-tire-company-airless-alloy-tires/ The immediate focus of the article is the most recent prior attempt to bring METL bicycle tyres to market in 2021, which I presume failed or we would have heard about it by now.
If memory serves, the Nitinol tyres with an off-world track record on various Rovers never went faster than 12mph or possibly even 12kph, so it isn't exactly a performance tyre. In fact, I seem to remember the thing was called a "Crawler" until NASA public relations or a newspaper reporter invented "Rover" as more exciting.
Mmm. I was already skeptical. On the Big Apples I've had two flats in near enough 15 years, both of them the result of over-exuberant riding i.e. avoidable. If I fit these expensive METL tyres and they work, what will I be giving up to assure no flats in the next 15 years? Comfort? Traction/adhesion at speed on poor road surfaces? Braking retardation (braking efficiency is always limited by the friction between the road surface and the tyre)? Above all, will I feel as secure on these tyres as I do on Big Apples, which from my very first ride were clearly superior tyres for my circumstances and riding style?