Author Topic: Are new designs really "better" than old...or just different?  (Read 5334 times)

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
Re: Are new designs really "better" than old...or just different?
« Reply #15 on: September 10, 2013, 02:19:26 PM »
1912 is earliest I could find, but they maybe have come earlier.

Bottom bracket gearing is also the "new best thing" but it's from early 1900s...

Me, ow, non cotterred cranks are definitely better...I've seen Le Manfriend break a few tools on them...
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8281
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Are new designs really "better" than old...or just different?
« Reply #16 on: September 10, 2013, 02:42:51 PM »
Oh! Cottered cranks! Hateful things in my book. Always a fuss to file the pin faces to match the taper on the spindle, then knocking them out again at the next service is no fun, either. Always stuck fast and then the threads got deformed even if one used care to leave the nuts on the threads.

Scarred me for life, I tell you!

All hail the cotterless square-taper three-piece crank!

Best,

Dan. (...who is just shaking off bad memories and will be okay again in a few minutes)