There's a noseless saddle I can recommend, that in its time was generally considered several cuts above all others. I rode it for several years until I switched to a Brooks, because the thick leather of the Brooks is just less bother than a saddle covered in cloth or whatever.
The good saddle is the Cheeko90, also sold under several other names. It looks like those small metal pan seats you used to see on tractors half a century and more ago, but is made of plastic and covered in a material that resembles MBTex (a whipcord cloth used in Mercedes in the 1970s and 80s) in all but durability. Mine wore the cloth out in about 6000km, which is what was wrong with the execution of a great ergonomic idea: they mistook their market as incidental cyclists (who would be comfotable but never wear the cloth out) whereas a lot of more constant cyclists with an engineering bent could see this was a good seat to try. The underpinnings, however, are of excellent, lasting quality, on mine at least (the one without the rear lamp).
When I discovered I couldn't buy another one new, I seriously considered going to the bother and expense of having mine recovered in leather because...
IT IS JUST PLAIN OUTRIGHT THE MOST COMFORTABLE SEAT I'VE EVER SAT IN ON A BICYCLE. It is simply basically easier and more comfortable to sit on than a bicycle saddle (even a well-broken-in Brooks) and it further allows the rider to move in ways that a normal saddle does not. I defy anyone not to find a comfortable seat on it. That's what makes it worth hunting down and restoring if all you can get is one with worn cloth.
Here are three photos Dan found, including a photo of the metal underpinnings, which do not give you as much fore and aft adjustment as you might expect as the seat is intended to be fitted with its front edge in line with seat tube and post. Nor do all Cheeko have the built-in rear lamp.
Good luck with finding a good one.
