Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Thorn General / Re: larger tyre up front on Mercury Mk3
« Last post by strictnaturist on February 16, 2026, 03:36:38 PM »
Thanks for your swift comments
To answer. Yep. I have done a few tracks in Scotland.Green routes in Europe and across Iceland. All mostly on the Sherpa.
I'll drop the gearing for the Mercury to assist.
Sounds like 54mm tyres should be enough on the Divide trail.
I'll investigate what tyres would be best. Comments welcome :-)
Still swithering about tubeless though?
All best wishes
spring is coming!
Eddie
52
Thorn General / Re: larger tyre up front on Mercury Mk3
« Last post by mickeg on February 16, 2026, 01:17:58 PM »
Stay with tubes. 

For touring, I drop my gear range down to 36 chainring and 16T sprocket.  That is very similar to your 43 and 19 ratio.  If it is too steep for that gearing, it also is too steep for me to pedal while keeping my heart rate in a reasonable range.  Thus, I get off the bike and walk it up the steeper hills.

Have you ridden much on rough trails before? 
53
Lighting and Electronics / Smiling Shark Headlamp
« Last post by in4 on February 16, 2026, 01:00:14 PM »
I’ve just received one of these as a gift. Out of the box it seems quite impressive. As a being seen light it is  certainly bright enough. As a seeing light I’ve yet to try it; suspect the range and spread might be limited. It’s USB rechargeable. Might be one for the campsite.

https://amzn.eu/d/04JRNXAh
54
Thorn General / Re: larger tyre up front on Mercury Mk3
« Last post by WorldTourer on February 16, 2026, 10:43:09 AM »
I'm heading over to Canada (from Scotland) this summer, to ride south for around 1000miles to Jackson, Wyoming on the Great Divide route with my son.

The GDMBR tends to get talked about today as more daunting terrain than it is. Once the bikepacking scene took off, it embraced this route which meets the Bikepacking.com definition because it is majority unpaved. However, before that, the GDMBR was commonly regarded as a touring route and people rode it on conventional touring bikes like the Surly LHT, with 2.00" or 2.15" tires. Loads of blogs were written about this, some of them are still up today. So, if you can fit 54 mm, you’re already well prepared, even if you might want to take advantage of being able to fit something slightly wider in front.
55
Thorn General / Re: larger tyre up front on Mercury Mk3
« Last post by Andyb1 on February 16, 2026, 10:20:39 AM »
Think of motorbikes John, most have bigger front wheels.   The same thing is happening with MTBs.  The term mullet applies.
I usually fit a larger section front tyre run softer than the rear to give some ‘suspension’ when hitting bumps.  My logic is that the front wheel is pushed down onto bumps while the rear is more likely to get pulled over them.
Also if hitting soft sand, a wider front tyre should be more stable.
56
Belt Drive / Re: Belt drive article from Thorn Blog
« Last post by martinf on February 16, 2026, 08:14:31 AM »
On the same page he also explains why you're likely to get 20,000km + from an uncovered KMC X1 chain with minimal maintenance.

I think that depends on where and when you ride. I live near the coast and ride in all weathers, so when it rains the tyres pick up wet sand and mud and a rim brake sprays it over the chain, even when I don't go off-road and keep to tarmac.

The best I have managed so far is 8,300 kms with an old type bushed 1/8" chain used on a hub gear bike. This was long before I knew about the ChainGlider. More typically, I would get between 2,000 and 4,000 kms on a derailleur bike. Bromptons are worse, typically 2,000 kms or less, probably because the transmission is closer to the ground and picks up more muck.

KMC advertises 3,500 kms plus for the successor to the X1 and 10,000 kms plus for their long-life 1/8" chain if used with their own 1/8" chainring and sprocket.

The photo attached shows the results of one of my first rides with a ChainGlider The wet sand on the outside of the ChainGlider would have gone on the chain if it wasn't covered.

In my experience, a ChainGlider keeps most of the mud and sand off the transmission. Water gets inside when it rains, but it drains out. A ChainGlider works for me to significantly reduce transmission maintenance.


57
Thorn General / Re: larger tyre up front on Mercury Mk3
« Last post by JohnR on February 16, 2026, 05:33:49 AM »
I can't think of a good reason for putting a bigger tyre on the front than on the back. In fact, I've done the opposite and put a slightly smaller tyre on the front on the basis that it carries less load than the rear tyre.

I was almost 70 when I first encountered tubeless bike tyres and am now a convert. A key requirement for a good tubeless experience is tubeless-ready rims. A good tyre-rim combination can be inflated with a simple pump. A poor combination results in much cursing and the need for a pressure tank. While tubeless tyres handle small punctures well, the ability to prevent a flat caused by a bigger cut is less certain and depends on the cut size and sealant. I've had one ride-stopping cut in ~20k miles which was caused by a flint shard. Attempts to plug the hole were unsuccessful so tyre boot and inner tube were needed.
58
Belt Drive / Re: Belt drive article from Thorn Blog
« Last post by WorldTourer on February 16, 2026, 01:17:41 AM »
For all the recommendations that the Chainglider gets here from a member or two, Thorn/SJS did try to dissuade me from buying one from their own shop a few years ago, calling it a “poor piece of gear” that had disappointed them in their own testing of it.

It’s also worth pointing out that some of the most popular long-haul bicycle-travel routes today involve water crossings. A chain is going to get dunked several times in just one single day on the Baja Divide, for example. A Chainglider is downright counterproductive then, it would trap water inside.

I have now put over 20,000 km on my belt drive and I am very satisfied. I think it is worth it in time savings alone, as it does not have to be cleaned or lubricated. No more expensive trousers being stained with oil, too. I have never even had the noise that some report, except for when I rode one wadi in Oman where the dust must have been of a peculiar composition, and then merely pouring some water over the belt was enough to make it quiet again.
59
Belt Drive / Re: Belt drive article from Thorn Blog
« Last post by PH on February 15, 2026, 11:20:00 PM »
Thanks for the link, I enjoyed reading that, but not as much as I enjoyed contrasting it with the piece on belts in Andy Blance's living with a Rohloff booklet, also available to download from the Thorn website.  On the same page he also explains why you're likely to get 20,000km + from an uncovered KMC X1 chain with minimal maintenance.  That's been my experience and is more than some of the Chainglider evangelists report.
When I first came across Thorn Bikes, in the late 90's, they stood out as having several opinions not shared by the rest of the cycle industry - Wheel size, disc brakes, kick stands, straight bars and later on belt drive...  I appreciate they're in the business of selling bikes, very nice bikes too, but they no longer stand out as being as different as they once were.
I'm curious to try a belt drive, just not curious enough to spend the money, for it to be to be economically justifiable it'd have to last me more miles than anyone is reporting they do.
60
Belt Drive / Re: Belt drive article from Thorn Blog
« Last post by martinf on February 15, 2026, 10:07:16 PM »
My opinion is that anyone who's still running a bare chain on a hub gearbox might as well go back to the days of constant running replacement expense and maintenance work and filthy derailleur.

My own opinion, based on my (at first sceptical) test of a ChainGlider is that :

- A hub gear system with ChainGlider keeps the transmission much cleaner and requires significantly less maintenance than a hub gear system with a bare chain.

- A hub gear system with a bare chain requires significantly less maintenance than a derailleur system. And when it does need maintenance, it is much easier to clean 1 chainring and 1 sprocket than multiple chainrings/sprockets and the rear derailleur (front doesn't need much cleaning).

On condition, of course, that the hub gear is reliable. I have had one or two unreliable hub gears, notably the first version of the Sturmey-Archer Sprinter 5-speed, which was a real pain.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10