Thanks, All, for the kind words; much appreciated!

I've missed here is the ability to "like" someone's post...
I'm always open to suggestions. I've been Forum Admin for the last 15 years now, and followed the Forum daily as a nonmember for 7 years before that, so I knew most of the faces when I signed on. Back in the day, the Forum's "Karma" setting was enabled, then switched off early on. Still available, is is described thusly:
"Karma is a feature that shows the popularity of a member. Members, if allowed, can 'applaud' or 'smite' other members, which is how their popularity is calculated".
This doesn't sound like what Moronic has in mind, and I fear it could lead to divisiness or diversion from our main purpose of "discussive camaraderie and mutual aid" as it can lead to competiveness in posting, gaming the system, or retribution in the case of feuds. Reading the Admin chatter on various fora, there can be a number of unintended consequences. I think if I could find a way to add only the thumbs-up as Monorinic suggested, that could work well. Something similar using emojis seems to work pretty well for Facebook, barring the sarcastic or inappropriate use of the "laughter" emoji.
An AI query returned this useful summary of the Karma opton pros and cons...
The pros and cons of the karma setting in SMF 2.0 can be summarized as follows:
Pros:
Allows users to earn and lose karma based on their contributions, fostering a sense of community and accountability.
Encourages users to engage in discussions and contribute to the forum, as karma can be gained or lost depending on their activity.
Provides a way to reward users for their active participation and engagement with the community.
Cons:
May lead to a negative perception of the forum if karma is not managed properly, as it can be seen as a form of "pay-to-win" or "gaming" the system.
Requires careful management to ensure that karma is awarded fairly and not abused by a small group of users.
May not be suitable for all types of forums, especially those that prioritize a more neutral or neutralizing approach to user contributions.
It is important for forum administrators to carefully consider the pros and cons of the karma setting and to implement it in a way that promotes a healthy and balanced community.
In contrast, I do like the idea of a "thumbs-up" for liked posts and agree it would encourage more open expression of approval for topics of interest. A quick check of the "SMS Forum Forum" shows it is on the development list and may be available soon as the open-source coders get to it. I'm not yet sure if it will be an inbuilt option or available as a "mod" (modification) that can be installed and then activated. I have generally tried to avoid mods over the years, as they can conflict with or are broken by later updates and can cause a mess. Some are innocuous yet useful, and those are high on my interest list. Even those bear watching for unintended consequences. Thumbs up/down options often affect page rankings, as on YouTube listings, so negatively rated posts can slide down the listings independent of date and vice versa for postive feedback. The result can present difficulty for those who just want to logon and see "the latest". Rankings work better and are more appropriate on a monetized platform.
Meantime, I can see view counts on each
topic and I use that
as a general measure of reader interest. It has been long enough since I logged in as a regular member, I'm not sure if most can see that or not. For me, the count appears just to the right of the topic title when viewing the topic and replies to it.
I do wish the Forum's internal mail system was back online and available. Ours broke in an upgrade and our (mine and Thorn's IT specialist) best efforts to restore it have been frustrated. There's a couple more things on my personal wish list I keep looking to implement and will, when available.
Thanks again for the kind words and suggestions!
Best, Dan.