1
General Technical / Re: On the biplane crown: what does it add to the bike's stiffness?
« Last post by Andyb1 on Today at 08:42:52 PM »Not sure I understand all of that…..but the basic problem with the longer biplane fork for me was that it raised the bottom bracket height too much. The alternative 40mm shorter Thorn fork I now use allows me to have the correct pedal - seat distance and still be able to get a foot safely down when stopping. Essential on sloping ground and when carrying luggage. I am sure both fork types are well strong enough for my riding speeds and style!Forks are measured crown race to axle (C>A) that's the only length that effects geometry, it makes no difference how much of that is crown and how much blade. I think there must have been some misunderstanding with your bike, I doubt Thorn has ever offered forks with a 40mm difference intended for the same frame.
My Raven Tour came with a biplane fork with L1 = 410mm but shorter unicrown forks with L1 = 370mm appear to have been an option - reference from Test of Raven Tour on SJS website. ‘Our Tour came with twin plate 531 ST forks…….a shorter 531 fork is also an option’
The RST used the shorter unicrown fork (for sharper handling?) and Thorn were happy to sell me the shorter fork when I cycled into them and explained the problem of high BB.
Did the RST have the same frame geometry as the Tour? I know it used lighter tubes in places.

Recent Posts