Thorn Cycles Forum

Community => Thorn General => Topic started by: PH on October 21, 2019, 08:41:15 am

Title: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: PH on October 21, 2019, 08:41:15 am
My normal touring has been for a maximum of a couple of weeks and more often less, the majority of it long weekends to a week.  For this I'm quite happy to compromise a bit on kit in order to keep the weight down and maximise the mileage.  My full camping load amounts of 12kg including the luggage and is packed in a pair of small panniers (Ortlieb Front rollers), a Carradice saddlebag and a bar bag.  The Mercury handles this OK, it's noticeable for the first few miles and then forgotten unless getting out of the saddle which requires some extra care.
However - I'm contemplating a longer tour next year and am wondering which bike to use.  In every other way the Merc is first choice, but I'd have to increase the luggage capacity.  I have the 853 fork so loading that up isn't an option and I wouldn't fancy adding anymore to the rear.  So amongst the things I'm considering is an fork swap, which brings me to the questions (Finally!)
Has anyone toured with four panniers on a Mercury?  Which fork?  How did you find it?  V or disc?  I have a disc wheel and brake on another bike I could borrow, swapping the fork is simple enough.   Another alternative to distribute the weight would be a frame bag, anyone use these?  I've also considered a trailer, I used one before behind an Audax bike and quite liked it, except it made train travel complicated.  Or there's always the tough it out option and don't carry any extras...
Any thoughts?
Title: Re: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: julk on October 21, 2019, 05:25:42 pm
I find a Revelate Tangle bag good for the heavy metal items.
This keeps these things within the frame in the middle of the bike and still room for a bike bottle.
There are a variety of brands out there now.
Title: Re: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: mickeg on October 21, 2019, 05:56:43 pm
A frame bag that fits in the triangle can hold a lot of weight, but the volume capacity is limited, much more limited than a pair of front panniers.  But it can be even tougher finding a good bag that fits.  I saw a bargain on Ebay, bought it as a roll of the dice, found it worked well in the front part of my Nomad triangle but I had to add a strap to the front to go around my head tube.

Frame bags can damage the paint if you are not careful. 
Title: Re: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: PH on October 22, 2019, 10:02:46 am
A frame bag that fits in the triangle can hold a lot of weight, but the volume capacity is limited, much more limited than a pair of front panniers.
Good point and it is weight distribution rather than volume that I'd like to distribute. Despite current fashions, it's hard to see that the traditional four pannier setup can be beaten.  On a short tour where it is mostly about the cycling, I would resent adding a couple of kg of rack and bags to carry a few extra bits, but this tour I'll be a lot less fussed.  If I'm going to do that, the question really is whether the Mercury is the best bike to do it to (I have others  ;))
Title: Re: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: John Saxby on October 22, 2019, 03:04:15 pm
Below, I've attached a photo of my Raven, loaded with camping gear for a short mid-summer tour this past June.

My setup & requirements may not translate directly to your Merc, but a few points may be relevant:

Hope that's useful,

Cheers,  J.
Title: Re: Loading up a Mercury
Post by: PH on October 22, 2019, 06:35:47 pm
Thanks John and julk, that frame bag looks good, though I don't think it has the extra capacity I was thinking of, though that's not set in stone.
The Raven is pretty much the perfect bike for four pannier touring, my Roholff started life in one, it'll be on here somewhere from 15 years ago, where does the time go...
For the riding I mostly do, the Mercury suits me better, though as this shows you can't have everything...