Thorn Cycles Forum
Community => Thorn General => Topic started by: stevegloster on November 26, 2007, 04:22:44 PM
-
Nobody could fail to notice just how popular Cyclo-Sportive rides have become over the last couple of years or so, and although I have yet to ride one, I am wondering why they are so popular. Is it the challenge of a long hilly ride and if so, why not ride an Audax instead which offer even bigger challenges in terms of distance at least and a lot cheaper too at an average of £5 instead of £25 for a Sportive.
-
I too am equally baffled.
Cycling Weekly seems to be hypnotised by them. At £25 a pop I bet the organisers love them too!
-
Reckon it's all in the marketing! Which sounds more immediately appealing to the uninformed newcomer to cycling, Cyclo-Sportive or Audax?
Most won't even know what Audax is, and won't be informed by the name itself either, so Cyclo-Sportif instinctively sounds more exciting, appealing and glamourous (to most!). By virtue this alone, Cyclo-sportif has the dominant market position, the pricing reflecting to a degree the laziness of participants in discovering cheaper equally viable alternatives.
-
quote:
Originally posted by stevegloster
Nobody could fail to notice just how popular Cyclo-Sportive rides have become over the last couple of years or so, and although I have yet to ride one, I am wondering why they are so popular. Is it the challenge of a long hilly ride and if so, why not ride an Audax instead which offer even bigger challenges in terms of distance at least and a lot cheaper too at an average of £5 instead of £25 for a Sportive.
I know what the difference is!
A Sportive is for racers with Colnagos and suchlike, who would not be seen dead with mudguards or a tourer.
Audax is for 'grown ups' with adventure in mind.
John.
www.pbase.com/john28july