I didn't mention walking because on another forum I'm on the anti-helmet zealots are always screeching that pedestrians should be made to wear helmets because walking is lethal. But I used to be a big hillwalker, on the Munster hills and mountains every weekend, until I took up cycling as an activity you can practice every day.
Overall, not distinguishing between genders, chances of a non-fatal injury is about eight times as high on your bike as on your feet. Chances of a fatal injury are, for practical purposes, about the same whether walking or cycling. Walking is, on the whole, another very low risk activity, just like cycling, just like motoring, for that matter. Again, men are more at risk then women. None of these differentials actually make it to the magnitude we decided above should be the minimum differentiation factor to pay attention in such very low risk activities.
Your little Hyundai is as powerful at 62bhp as my first Porsche was, a plain 1600cc 356B which produced all of 60bhp. (Well, I had a Speedster before that made 102bhp after I breathed on it, but it was strictly a racer.) But the Porsche was fun to drive and would not complain if cruised all day at its maximum of about 95mph.
