Author Topic: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC  (Read 5739 times)

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« on: January 21, 2013, 07:52:32 pm »
In light of Thorn now offering bikes with Shimano hub gears here's a brief review of my mum's Koga Alfine 11 bike.

My parents love cycling in weekends, and have always cycled Dutch Roadster inspired bikes, eg full mudguards, "sit up and beg" position. I got a chance to try my mum's Koga Signature for an hour cycle with my dad.

I will share my opinion on how both bikes feel for people that are looking to find the right bike. As I ride different types of bikes (fixed, XTC, old roadster) too.

My Thorn XTC setup: Sun CR18 rims, Derailleur Triple, Drop bars (steel and 26" wheels). No suspension. Avid Short Canti's. Around 14 KG with Shimano dynohub and LED lights. Semi sporty position.

My mum's Koga: A modified Comfort City with option to carry low-riders.
Alumium triple butted frame, small travel suspension in fork just underneath head tube, Maguara hydralic brakes. About 18KG. Sit up and beg position.

The test ride.

The Thorn normally get taken for 30 minute rides to work on reasonably potholed roads.
I went cycling with my dad on Dutch roads/cycle lanes which where very smooth therefore I can't say if the suspension on the Koga was needed...the roads were too good!

The extra weight of the Koga wasn't much noticeable on starting. But it was much more "sluggish" in acceleration than the XTC. 4KG weight on top of the XTC is a factor possibly. The small travel suspension fork may have had something to do with this also.

I don't think the tires/rims had anything to do with it, wheels felt very reactive and rolled well.

I didn't notice any drag or gaps in shifting (the infamous Rohloff 7/8 gear shift) or noise with the Alfine 11. No sound of the sprockets engaging like on a triple. So it's silent (which you get used to, as you need to relearn the engagement point there's no click to help you)

It handled very well and overall the finish of it is very well, welds are tiny for alu, paintwork is very well done, rims are excellent and my dad told me that compared to his 8 years old Alu Batavus the frame is much more stiff. Overall a quality bike clearly.

Overall to me the bike felt very comfortable but "dead". The suspension dampens the road and slows acceleration by pushing weight forward and stomping (as the fork goes down first...) and the frame is very stiff which is ideal, shifting was light and easy and the bike happily rolled along and steered well. Just a tad slower than my XTC.

Position

A sit up and beg position is comfortable but has the downside of catching a bucketload of wind, and because you cannot pull against the bars (which you can if bars are roughly saddle height or lower) you don't have an optimal position for power/speed.

My personal preference therefore still is about 45 degrees forward (semi sporty) as that bit of extra power is nice to have for hills/long rides and dipping down is handy if there's a lot of wind (which we get in NL).

But of course it also depends on the state of your back/neck/wrists. If no problems, a semi sporty may be fine. But  if you really want 0 weight on your wrists a sit up may be best for you.

Rims

The Koga rims roll very well, and even though the bike isn't a lightweight at 18KG is rolls away quickly. It's hard to compare "feel" as mine are 26" Koga are 700c but the wheels felt very good.

They are Koga branded Exal light rims. A Shimano dynohub is fitted to the LED light system (which is what I use for winter)

Gears

Shimano Alfine 11 VS Shimano Triple.
Well. It both works! I grew up on 3 speed SA hub gears and they're the ultimate practical gears.

Speed wise, I noticed the *very occasional* slow shift on the Alfine. There was no drag or dead points in shifting, or any noise.

If you travel with your bike or have to cycle extreme mucky/snow conditions I'd go for a hub gear. If you commute and often need to change gear or have to park in overful cycle racks (NL comes to mind) again hub gear. And hub gears have the advantages of being knocks and transport (no bent derailleur hangars)

Some members here have to cycle in -20 celsius conditions with a lot of snow and noticed their Rohloffs kept going while derailleurs seized. As the hub is basically an oil bath temperature is less critical, nothing can seize. And you don't have to clean grot of your sprockets every week (or more often) when the rain and grit season hits.

Derailleurs are often a bit cheaper and easier to get, and can be repaired on the road. As unfortunately when a hub gear does go belly up (very very rare to have a total failure though) unless you have a Rohloff you're a bit stuck. However, you are more likely to get a bust derailleur hangar than a full failure.

If you have to shift under pressure, you need a deraileur as hub gears don't like being shifted under pressure, you need to keep the pedal moving but can't put hard force through either the gear jams or it goes, but in the long run it wear it down much quicker.

Hub gear wheels are not dished which is good if you need to go on insanely bad roads.

Brakes

Maguru hydralics are more powerful than my canti's. A good set of V-brakes does the job for a lower price. Hydralics may be overkill unless you go down very steep descents. And they eat your rim a bit more than standard Vs, so you may then need tungsten rims. If in doubt you really need hydralics, I would just go for V-brakes/canti's.

Weight

So for the extra weight the Koga offers: Mud guards (nice if you don't like lycra or stuffing your pants in your socks) a suspension travel fork, AXA lock and fender lights. And I would say a little bit more material in the frame, as it can carry 140KG (rider plus luggage) the XTC info for my 525L frame I have is 20KG and rider, I'd say 120 maybe 140. *some people noticed XTC can flex a tad with a heavy rider I am a light person at 61 KG mark*

Of course a Sherpa or another tourer with a heavier steel frame means more load carrying.

Suspension

The roads were simply too good. I think a small travel fork might actually be very nice on the potholed UK roads. Rollsplit for example is an absolute wrist killer on long rides.

But...you can also put on fat tires on your bike. I would try fat tires VS the suspension if unsure. Both carry a performance penalty: Tires as they're harder to accelerate, suspension as you lose a bit of pedal power due to fork travel.
Budget wise putting fatter tires on your steed is cheaper than having to change forks.

The Verdict

Well...as always budget is often a starting factor. The Rohloff was 850 euros extra for 3 more gears and a slightly longer range. And Alfine may just be fine. Of course Thorn does offer a Rohloff on expedition tourers due to their excellent breakdown service.

I would personally not get suspension unless it's a must, eg a lot of muddy and rocky roads too poor for the cyclocross brigade, as I don't like the feel of it.

Alu VS Steel is a very very old "no no" debate on cycle forums. It's impossible to decide unless you compare the exact two bikes one in alu, one in steel. But you can't as generally forks are steel on tourers, or suspension. Alu cannot be fixed without specialist tools, hence Thorn offers steel only. Koga offers a frame replacement service on their Traveller expedition tourers to make up for this.

I like the feel of steel, how it eats up road buzz and has a lively feel. But again the XTC is a high quality frame, and I've never ridden a high quality all alu bike and some people don't like steel at all, as for them the frames flex too much. Koga frame is excellent quality but don't know...aestethics wise the thinner steel tubing is what I prefer.

The extra chainguard etc. are nice. But again, some people love "no frills" bikes and some people like extra.

Verdict

I would ride an XTC with an Alfine hubgears are good no oiling, regular cleaning, chain stretch and no ARGH ORANGE SPROCKETS during salting season in winter... And an Axa lock is good thing too.

The rest well, I rather stuff my trousers in my sock and have clip-ons instead of extra weight. I did notice that 4KG extra/suspension is slowing down acceleration and it's not great on hills either.

As for you, well...what do you want to do? A Sherpa is fine all round tourer or maybe you want to get a Thorn built with Alfine (see the workshop sales) as you like hub gears...or hate cleaning ;)
 
What is your back/neck like, do you like a bit of speed or want more comfort?
Do you need to carry 20KG or 60?

Questions question...after you decided on the rides you do, if the bike feels right for you then go for it, else there's the money back/test rides at Thorn :)
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)

Andre Jute

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2013, 08:45:12 pm »
That's good stuff, Jawine, the sort of article you wish for when you're a newbie struggling to decide what should be on your decision tree for a bike, and what is just fluff.

Andre Jute

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2013, 08:56:02 pm »
Very nicely done review, Jawine! A very well done compare-and-contrast review that lays the differences out nicely.

Yes, agreed with Andre...this is *exactly* the sort of thing one wishes for when looking at a bike different to what one
has. Nice to see you bringing your own perspective to it all...so refreshing compared to the usual reviews of bikes.

All the best,

Dan.


JimK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • Interdependent Science
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2013, 03:42:51 pm »
I was well into the process of buying a Koga Signature w/Rohloff ... I had asked whether I could get a 38 tooth chainring instead of the 40... the Signature menus are nice enough but not really as flexible as what SJS will do. But then the USA distributor got dropped somehow by Koga and I found myself exploring the Thorn option.

One thing I love about travelling is looking at bikes. They do vary! I was in Kyoto for a few days maybe 10 years ago. I remember not being able to figure out like what sort of gears people had. The whole set up I saw on the typical bike was totally different.

One a recent trip to Seattle I think I saw two Rohloffs in about 5 minutes, right by the Fremont bridge which is crazy with bikes. I have yet to see one on the East Coast, apart from the one on my own bike!

Down in New York City I do see some fancy city bikes. But never a Koga!
 

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2014, 08:11:22 pm »
Just going back to this, as I've cycled it again: The Koga is very stiff, my dad really noticed this when he changed from an old Batavus.

However, compared to the XTC its harder on the wrists, as it transmits shocks more. The tires on it are narrow which plays a role, the high headtube and stiff frame I suspect contribute.

Of course the frame stiffness is excellent for load bearing / strong cyclists. I find my xtc much more comfortable, but I'm light. If you have a tendency to bend and flex frames, the koga may be a better tradeoff. Or get a sturdy thorn model :)
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)

Andre Jute

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2014, 11:07:09 pm »
I don't mind trading off weight for comfort, and have found that I'm not really trading off speed because overall my average is actually faster because I've disposed the extra weight well as a fat low pressure tyres and other items that permit me to ride the roughest roads at speed without paying much attention to the sort of irregularities that will dismount a rider on a lighter bike or even bend a rim. Those Koga have Exal rims for a good reason: they're just about indestructible, but labeling them "light" is some kind of Belgian humor! I agree with Jawine wholeheartedly: steel is kinder to the wrists and the back than ali. I have two city-sports bikes from The Netherlands, a Gazelle (built on a frame shared with an earlier touring Koga -- Koga is Gazelle's upmarket brand) and a Benelux-only Trek, and they're just not as agreeable to ride as my steel bike. Steel just chews up microvibrations so that they don't reach your wrists, or reach them much, much weakened, compared to aluminium.

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2014, 06:41:43 pm »
The Koga has a carbon fork, supposedly carbon helps on the road buzz front. Supposedly.

Its hard to say unless you use same rims, I notice xtc feels rougher on bumps than my gazelle track (also steel) bum wise though both are kind on wrists. And open sports in 700c are probably a touch more "soft" than cr18 in 26".

Did you ever wheel swap on your bikes?

Now for a full carbon touring bike to test...sjs get on it (runs and hides)
Those already exist, perhaps only a matter of time...?
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)

jags

  • Guest
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2014, 08:30:37 pm »
carbon up front will just give you more a roadbike feel which imho is a million times better 700v600 give me 700 any day of the week with 25mm tyres .
i suppose if you doing adventure touring a proper touring bike would be the weapon of choice but for a week's  sight seening a road bike that can take 2 rear panniers  is good enough carbon /steel/alu/ti doesn't make a jot of difference.

anto.

Andre Jute

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2014, 01:05:25 am »
The Koga has a carbon fork, supposedly carbon helps on the road buzz front. Supposedly.

Supposedly is a good word.

Did you ever wheel swap on your bikes?

Yes, though I didn't discover anything that sitting in a chair and putting my mind in gear wouldn't have told me: Slick 60mm tyres at pressures under 2 bar on well-built 700C rims may take a bit longer to accelerate but take much longer to run out, and are on average much, much faster than narrow high pressure tyres because road condition, and bangs to coccyx, and tolerance in the wrists to road buzz, become irrelevant, as do obstructions on the road.

It's a pity that my Gazelle Toulouse and my Trek Smover run out of fork width around 37-42mm, because it would be interesting to know whether 60mm Big Apples at low pressure kill the road buzz that always seems to accompany ali frames, or whether the steel frame of my Utopia Kranich must share some of the credit.


martinf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1143
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2014, 08:27:33 am »
How was the saddle ?

I've ridden Northern European sit up and beg bikes on 3 exchange holidays, twice in the Netherlands and once in Denmark. The first couple of times I used the saddle that was on the bike (some kind of plastic padded affair in both cases), OK for short trips, but uncomfortable for me on longer rides.

For the most recent exchange holiday (2012) I took the Brooks B17 that was comfortable for all-day riding on my Spain tour and fitted it to our exchange partner's Batavus Jakima sit up and beg bike. This had a very tall 65 cm frame, there was just enough room to fit the B17 and get the correct height for me. But even with the adjustable stem fully forward and as low as possible, it wasn't very comfortable.

So I agree with André's opinion that a wider saddle would be best on a bike with an upright position.

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #10 on: December 25, 2014, 03:27:18 pm »
That's my experience too.

Selle SMP trk on my thorn is a touch too wide on front, and causes some rubbing but I'm sure its fine on an uprighter. A pro model is just fine for me, it has a narrowish nose but wide at the rear.

My mum has a big wide gel affair which after an hour and a half started pressing into "the bits". Too soft isn't good, you sink in. But my mum has no issues and loves it. I must have a different hip build :)

I run 1.3 panaracers on thorn, not that much wider than 32s on the Koga. I suspect the frame flexiness is, in this case, the biggest factor.
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)

anniesboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2014, 08:41:09 am »
Jawine,I think you should seek out one of these.

http://forum.ctc.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=30192

JWestland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 756
Re: A ride on my mum's Koga City Signature VS my Thorn XTC
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2014, 09:19:22 pm »
There was one on eBay some time ago...too big for me however.

#truestory ;)
Pedal to the metal! Wind, rain, hills, braking power permitting ;)