Author Topic: Sherpa Shimmy resolved with superb warranty response by Thorn Cycles  (Read 47388 times)

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Hi All!

My Sherpa developed a severe shimmy problem under heavy load. Despite applying my best efforts and calling on the collective wisdom of the Forum, the problem persisted. Robin Thorn, his designer and "test pilot" Andy Blance, shipping supervisor Cath Colenso, and the entire Thorn staff became involved in addressing the problem and made every possible effort to help and assist me. They communicated with me nearly every business day by email, and at their expense shipped a Thorn EXP rack and a replacement front fork in a different offset in an attempt to resolve the problem with this one rogue Sherpa. When it became evident the problem could not be addressed, they offered to replace my bike with a Nomad Mk2, since the Sherpa Mk2 was no longer available and the Sherpa Mk3 has a lower load rating insufficient for my expeditionary needs.

My acceptance of their offer did not mean the end of their help and assistance. They volunteered to test the new bike to be certain it would meet my requirements, and Andy loaded the bike with my maximum expected load and set off to do just that, as Robin followed in the company van and Cath caught it all on video, available for viewing here: http://www.facebook.com/Touringbikes

As I write this, the Sherpa is boxed in my livingroom, awaiting collection by Thorn for a complete analysis of the problem. This is simply outstanding customer service, and we can all rest easier knowing that Thorn stand behind their warranty and have gone far beyond the efforts of any other bike-maker I can imagine. My sincere thanks and gratitude to Thorn the company, to Robin Thorn himself, to Andy, to Cath, and to the entire staff for an outstanding job. I can't begin to describe the incredible care and detail with which the new bike was assembled, packed, and shipped; it is simply perfect, and performs as one would expect -- like a Thorn.

I have decided to leave this thread intact, as the efforts I went to in attempting to resolve the shimmy might prove helpful to others investigating any similar problem on their own bikes of any make. In doing so, I want to express my heartfelt "Thanks!" to each and every contributor and correspondent who tried so hard to help resolve my problem and supported my efforts to fix it on my own before I notified Thorn and asked for their help.

A summary of Thorn's efforts begins on Page 9 of this thread, followed by an explanation of Andy Blance's test-load and general-load recommendations in his own words on Pages 9 and 10. I thought them to be of such value, I posted them as a standalone sticky post here for easy reference: http://www.thorncycles.co.uk/forums/index.php?topic=4515.0

When and if the cause of my Sherpa's shimmy can be found, I will append it to the end of this thread.

And now, onto the original thread, as it played out...

All the best,

Dan.
-------------------------

Hi All,

Sherpa has developed a severe shimmy problem, and I need to call upon the Collective Hive Mind of the Forum for help.

Earlier, I loaded Sherpa in a number of fully-loaded touring configurations and took him on long day rides. No problem. Solid as a rock.

Today, I loaded everything up and planned to take a shakedown tour to the mountains. Big problem. The bike was so unridable I had to walk it down 6% hills, which was no fun in racing cleats. I have given up on the shakedown tour, and am back at home to try and sort things out.

I made a quick little table and attached it as a .jpg so you can see what I carried and where. Compared to a desert crossing, I did not have any water in the MSR dromedary bag atop the rear rack. I would normally carry 6l there, so that is 13.23lbs/6kg saved there.  As it was, my entire load *on* the bike was 82.09lb/37.24kg. Add my 172lb/78kg and the bike's weight of 42lb19.05kg (1.4lb was added with the ring-lock) and the total on the tires is 296.09lb/134.30kg as I rode it today. Earlier, he had worked fine with a load of 103lb/46.72kg carrying the extra water.

Here's what I found:
1) The shimmy was not always present. It never appeared below 9mph/14.5kph. It manifested from about 10-15mph/16-24kph, and then subsided until about 18mph/29kph and was present thereafter. It was horrible at 25mph/40kph and I once took the bike up to 45mph/72kph and really wished I hadn't.
2) The shimmy was worse when I removed one hand from the handlebars.
3) The shimmy manifested as a sine wave in the top tube, with an amplitude of about 1.5cm from center, and at a frequency of about 2.7 cycles/second. It was about as quick as you can say "Wogga-wogga-wogga" in one second.
4) Once started, the shimmy was self-perpetuating within a speed range. It didn't quiet down after a couple cycles, but just kept going.
5) I tried riding loose, tense, and hanging on for dear life; none made a difference. Neither did gripping the top tube with my knees or a closed hand.
6) I was riding only on pavement, but road surface did make a difference. Not the immediate surface, but the smoothness. Wavy pavement triggered the shimmy immediately.

Here's what I tried:
1) Adjusted tire pressure. Up to 55psi F/R. then down to 40 F/R. Then differentially, 55/40 and 40/55. No difference.
2) Moved both steerer mounted 1l bottles to rear rack-top. Very slight positive difference, but not enough to matter.
3) Emptied both steerer mounted 1l bottles. Very slight positive difference, but not enough to matter.
4) Emptied all three 1.5l bottles on frame. Very slight positive difference, but not enough to matter.
5) Removed and stashed handlebar bag in bushes. Very slight positive difference, but not enough to matter.
6) Re-oriented rack-top load F/R and then redistributed it side-to-side. Very slight positive difference, but not enough to matter.
7) Checked headset; properly adjusted.
8 ) Checked wheels; properly tensioned and true.
9) Checked tires; properly seated and true except for the usual slight wander of the tread cap.
10) All bags solidly mounted and noise-free.
11) All racks solidly mounted and noise-free. No discernible sway in either rack. The shimmy involved mostly the top tube from what I could see. I took a video, but gave up after a few seconds 'cos riding with one hand was almost impossible. Later, I may try posting the two clips I took.
12) Before emptying my water, all the bottles were full and slosh-free.
13) All heavy objects were placed toward the center of the bike L/R and F/R to keep the polar moment of inertia as low as possible. The load was well-balanced and well-placed.
14) Sherpa's frame appears sound in every way, with no bends, misalignment, or broken welds. I have never taken a fall on him, nor has he toppled over while parked. And yes, the wheel quick-releases are tight.
15) The packing scheme is the same as in earlier test runs, except for lacking the extra 6l of water in the MSR Dromedary atop the rear rack. Earlier, he did fine with a load of 103lb/46.72kg carrying the extra water.

Since everything is a known weight and modular, I think I will add or subtract modules as needed and then race up and down the street in front of the house to see if there is a difference. I've rearranged my schedule for the Big Tour, and right now, I can't take it, so I'm up against the calendar. I love the bike, have a sizable investment of time and money in it, and need to make it workable if at all possible.

This is essentially what happened to my Miyata 1000LT *after* my Great Basin tour in 2010, and led to my purchasing Sherpa. I carried 77lb/35kg of load then, and used the Thorn Low-Loader in front. I broke a weld on the last strut of my alu rear rack and replaced it with the Surly Nice (Rear) rack before retiring the bike due to the shimmy problem, which by that time manifested even without a touring load. Both racks were transferred to Sherpa and appear sound and solid in every way.

My thanks to all in advance. I do so hope I can come to a resolution that will resolve the problem and allow me to use the frame for its intended purpose, as it did so well on earlier test runs. I'm baffled.

Best,

Dan.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 07:10:36 am by Danneaux »

Pavel

  • Guest
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2012, 08:47:38 pm »
rear rack bolt loose?  Happened to me once, in a similar way to your excitement - so it is just a thought. 

richie thornger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
    • Batman to Robben
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2012, 08:54:22 pm »
Apologies if this posts twice. My first attempt has fallen into a black hole.  This is probably not the answer Dan but I thought I had to mention it. My fully loaded Raven Tour had a wobble at full load 40kg but not at 10kg
less. It turned out to be the Pitlocks needed tightening. No problem at all until that last 10kg was added. I know you don't use them but I thought I would mention it. Good luck with your detective work.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2012, 09:35:28 pm »
Excellent ideas!

Checked the rack bolts, Pavel; all as tight (and LocTite!) as can be.

Checked the SON28 bolt-on front skewer and the Shimano Deore rear Q/R skewer, Richie. Both are secure to specs.

Just did a number of quick runs in front of the house, carrying *only* the LF pannier, the RF pannier, and the HB bag @ 31.95lb/14.49kg. The bike was as thoroughly pleasant and vice-free as when it is completely unladen. I could happily tour like this. Steady as can be right up to 25mph/40.23kph with both hands on the bars, one off, and both hands off, sitting upright, with hands on the tops, on the brake hoods, and on the drops. Steady and safe as houses, no hint of shimmy, even when I horsed around on the bike (leaning to one side, moving around in the saddle, etc).

Onward.

Best (and thanks!),

Dan.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2012, 12:10:11 am by Danneaux »

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2012, 09:59:25 pm »
Okay...

Just added the 2 steerer-mounted waterbottles at 1l each for a total of 4.46lb/2.02kg
*and*
the 3-1.5l bottles to the downtube and seat tube cages
, for another 10lb/4.54kg

Total additional, 14.46lb/6.56kg.

Grand total with the two front panniers and handlebar bag is 46.41lb/21.05kg, all on the front wheel and mid-frame.

Handling definitely felt heavier, but absolutely no sign of shimmy, and was repeatedly able to ride no-hands and in all positions at 25mph.

Correlation does not equal causation, but this makes me hopeful the problem is not solely due to heavy weight at the front or midframe.  I suspect the shimmy may be due to the load atop the rear rack (tail wagging the dog effect or -- same frequency -- the 1994 Ertl "Jibber Jabber" doll effect, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Cey1t6ZEA ), but will wait to see what the qualitative and empirical data say. It may well be the shimmy is induced by an additive and synergistic effect, so I will also strip the bike and start adding weight from the rear moving forward.

More in a bit...

Best,

Dan.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2012, 12:09:35 am by Danneaux »

Andre Jute

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4068
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2012, 10:11:55 pm »
Sorry to hear your shakedown and potentially your tour are endangered by the shimmy, Dan. Interesting post you just sent.When it appeared I had just binned a post which suggested that, while a particular weight setting up a vibration is possible in physics, on a bike it is far more likely that a particular *distribution* of that weight is the culprit. I binned the post on the ground that I'm far away and there is nothing more irritating, when you're already under pressure, than idiots trying to teach you to suck eggs. Just as well I didn't send it! You were there already.

Good luck with finding the right distribution of your luggage.

Andre Jute

jags

  • Guest
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2012, 10:22:37 pm »
great video Dan,
well i'm surprized to hear the bike has a shimmy  i know mine is solid at any speed.
i don't carry anything like you do so it's obvious it's down to weight .
i was going to say check your headset and are your bars dead centre on the stem, but  your skill in all things bikes  ruled these suggestions out .Sorry buddy know idea what the problem is but one thing's for certain if it can be fixed it's in the right place.
best of luck Dan with your tour i'm sure you will have all sorted  very soon.
cheers
jags.

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2012, 10:27:09 pm »
Video snippets here (all I could take under the circumstances, a quick and dirty job of it):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcvXis7V8YQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaCi3CNq2Go

Andre, thanks so much for your suggestion; I do believe it is not so much the sheer weight as the distribution. I'm guessing the rear racktop load might be the culprit, but we shall have to see.

Jags, thanks also for the suggestions. Yes, headset = OK, bars and stem centered on steerer and on bike.

I keep trying to think what -- if anything -- could have changed to induce the wobble/shimmy.

Have to admit, I thought it might be a fork-loading problem, but it rode beautifully with just a front load, as I have found on other bikes with similar trail and fork blade gauge/wall thickness and low-riders.

Back out for more testing...

Best,

Dan.

jags

  • Guest
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2012, 10:39:01 pm »
wow thats looks serious, dan did you try swapping the wheels thats if you have another set of 600.

julk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 974
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2012, 11:24:02 pm »
Dan,
I have not experienced the dreaded shimmy, but I can feel the effect of the load on top of my rear rack when off cycle camping.
I can compare this with bringing my shopping home in four panniers, often with a greater load than when camping. The load on top definitely changes the handling feel.

I think you need to try bringing the load as far forward as possible on the rear rack (reduce the tail wagging effect) or change the load to be bigger or smaller than that which is inducing the shimmy.
I hope this helps.
Julian.

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2012, 12:07:51 am »
Okay...getting closer. I also attached both rear panniers and went out for another series of speed runs. This may also be known to cardiac specialists as a stress test; by this time, I found I had to really work to top 20mph/32kph.

The rear bags added 24.66lb/11.19kg, for an on-bike total of 71.07lb/32.24kg.  The only thing missing is the rack-top load at 11.02lb/5.0kg.

Everything went fine, with no sign of shimmy as fast as I could go, no-handed, one-handed, and in all positions.

However, at stop, with the *rear* brake locked, I could (for the first time in these at-home trials) simulate the shimmy by rapidly jerking the handlebars back and forth while straddling but not restraining the frame with both feet on the ground. I'm also a step closer to describing the effect and why it manifests in the middle of the top tube. The masses at either end are joined by a (relatively) flexible member. When this thing shimmys, the poor top tube (and to a certain extent, the downtube), serves as a linear spring actuated by and reacting to the two opposing masses at either end.

I agree with you, Julian, and Andre is onto something as well -- it isn't the mass alone that is the culprit, but the distribution. I readily agree -- if I can move the weight at either end toward the center, it is bound to help. I must be fairly fit or this number of intervals would have already killed me, but I'm good for as many more as it takes if it solves the problem so I can tour.
Quote
did you try swapping the wheels thats if you have another set
No luck there, jags. The front wheel from the tandem matches, but the rear is spaced too wide to install on Sherpa. Good idea, though.
. . .
After resting a bit, I went out for more intervals. I left the front and middle loaded as before, and removed both rear panniers. I then added the rack-top load at 11.02lb/5.0kg. bringing the total weight on the bike to 57.43lb/26.05kg. The bike handles beautifully with no sign of shimmy at 20mph/32kph in all riding modes. So much for my theory of the rack-top load being the prime culprit. It may be a major contributor, but it had help from the other stuff.

Going to now strip the bike, load from the rear, and see what happens.

Thanks so much for the thoughts and ideas. At this point, everything may be useful, so please keep 'em coming.

Best,

Dan.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2012, 12:12:24 am by Danneaux »

jags

  • Guest
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2012, 12:14:22 am »
your getting closer Dan fair play to you. but we (well me) needs to see video evidence ;)

JimK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • Interdependent Science
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2012, 12:44:20 am »
I wonder if the rear rack is flexing back and forth somehow. To check, maybe you could tape a piece of cardboard between a left and right support. If you welded a piece of metal like that, it would really stiffen the rack and prevent it from swaying right to left. But a taped piece of cardboard would be more like a fuse. It would just break somehow, like snap the tape or rip it off the cardboard. The cardboard brace should withstand a ride when there is no swaying, but break somehow when the swaying happens, if that is the source of the problem.

Nice puzzle, but your systematic investigation is practically certain to nail it.

Danneaux

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8232
  • reisen statt rasen
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2012, 01:58:00 am »
Quote
I wonder if the rear rack is flexing back and forth somehow. To check, maybe you could tape a piece of cardboard between a left and right support.
That's a good idea, Jim, a bit like they used to do in the old pulp-fiction detective novels when they'd tape a hair across a door and then check later to see if the hair was broken/the room had been entered.

Yeah, I wonder about that rack as well. It is incredibly heavy and stoutly built, but it is not triangulated side-to side like the Tubus (it only has a second crossmember at the rear, down couple-centimeters from the ones that make the load deck. The Surly front rack was too laterally flexible for me, so I sold it. The rear appears much stiffer (I even reefed on it with both hands and couldn't budge it, and the load appeared steady in that way), but of course I can't see it when all the shimmying is going on, so a "tell" as you suggest would surely do the job.

Excellent suggestion!

Boy, I wish I could get this all resolved today so I could take off on the shakedown trip tomorrow. My schedule is one factor, but the greater one is ODOT may open the Old McKenzie Highway to all traffic and if it does, I can't go (too dangerous in my estimation).

Best,

Dan.

il padrone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
Re: Wow! Whoa!...woe. Severe Sherpa shimmy under load.
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2012, 02:42:02 pm »
Yeah, I wonder about that rack as well. It is incredibly heavy and stoutly built, but it is not triangulated side-to side like the Tubus (it only has a second crossmember at the rear, down couple-centimeters from the ones that make the load deck. The Surly front rack was too laterally flexible for me, so I sold it. The rear appears much stiffer (I even reefed on it with both hands and couldn't budge it, and the load appeared steady in that way), but of course I can't see it when all the shimmying is going on, so a "tell" as you suggest would surely do the job.
I've never been too impressed with that Surly rack because of that. The Tubus Cargo is very solid, because of its triangulation IMHO. However even some flex should not give you that sort of harmonic shimmy. Before I got the Tubus I had a Topeak alloy rack for many years that was similarly straight legged, no triangulation. It was quite flexxy compared to the Tubus (similar to the Blackburn rack), but I never had speed shimmy issues.

It is probably just some sort of load distribution thing. Try different combinations, maybe load the front panniers more, less in the rackbag..... mix it about. A mate of mine had problems with a locally-made frame - speed wobbles that only showed when he was descending and only when lightly loaded with one front bag on the rear, in a crosswind. It happened several times to him, but not when fully loaded. He was disturbed enough that he bought a Sherpa frame for the bike and swapped all the parts, and now much happier.

Actually he will be cycling McKenzie Pass in the next few months, on a tour of the NW of USA on his Bike Friday  :)