Author Topic: Appearances (sorry)  (Read 13777 times)

WindyRob

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #30 on: June 11, 2007, 10:55:26 pm »
I've joined Photobucket so here goes....



 

freddered

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #31 on: June 12, 2007, 10:09:44 am »
Very nice.

That reminds me..I must start saving for the Thorn Audax.
 

stutho

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 848
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #32 on: June 12, 2007, 11:05:58 am »
Great Looking bike, Happy birthday for tomorrow!

WindyRob

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #33 on: June 12, 2007, 05:41:46 pm »
i'm tempted to try the Midsummer corker 100k Audax event this weekend on her. it says on the website over 2000m of climb; anyone done it before, and how bad is it?

Rob
 

The Raucous AUK

  • Guest
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #34 on: June 12, 2007, 10:01:27 pm »
Awesome! What size did you go for and do you want to sell it to me? I need a spare!

wheezy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #35 on: June 12, 2007, 10:03:42 pm »
Blimey, you don't half get blown off topic round here.

Fred A-M

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #36 on: June 13, 2007, 10:29:17 am »
It used to be worse, believe me!

Have you decided to go for an RST then?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 10:30:26 am by Fred A-M »
 

wheezy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #37 on: June 13, 2007, 10:43:29 am »
No, I continue to blow hither and thither on the winds of... something. I've been trying to settle on a decision for months, and the more time passes, the more hesitant and indecisive I get. This afternoon I'm off to see a local frame builder, which will undoubtedly confuse me even more.

The Raucous AUK

  • Guest
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #38 on: June 13, 2007, 12:00:47 pm »
Robin Mather perhaps?

wheezy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #39 on: June 13, 2007, 12:06:06 pm »
That's the fella. Do you know him, or his work?

freddered

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #40 on: June 13, 2007, 04:59:56 pm »
Does he give 100 day money back guarantee if you don't like the finished product?

If not, buy a RST first.  It avoids making a big mistake
 

The Raucous AUK

  • Guest
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #41 on: June 13, 2007, 10:25:27 pm »
quote:
Originally posted by wheezy

That's the fella. Do you know him, or his work?



No, I don't know him but made a tentative enquiry for a frame back in 2004 and he responded in a most courteous manner. For various reasons (including dithering on my part, wanting a really traditional lugged steel frame and cost!) I made a wrong decision and had a frame built by Bob Jacksons.

Anyway, I enjoy a dip into his website and just wish that he updated his gallery a bit more often! He seems much more open-minded than some frame builders I've contacted.

jawj

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #42 on: June 25, 2007, 10:15:31 pm »
Bit slow on the uptake here, but might Thorn use these short head tubes to maximise standover height...?

***Opinion warning*** ;-)
Yeah, it looks a little weird, but functions well, allows LOTS of adjustment and at least they don't resort to using those frankly ghastly very upright stems... Ugh.

The Raucous AUK

  • Guest
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2007, 09:22:40 pm »
On a compact frame then standover height isn't really an issue as 2cm on the head tube doesn't mean a 2cm increase on the standover.

And as for the "ghastly very upright stems" then doesn't a short head tube push you into the direction of upright stems and/or an excessive amount of spacers?

jawj

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Appearances (sorry)
« Reply #44 on: June 27, 2007, 10:59:08 pm »
Good point about the head tubes! Hmmm, why DO they have such short head tubes...?

Again, it's just my opinion but think a stack of spacers looks better than "the "ghastly very upright stems"".