Thorn Cycles Forum

Technical => Wheels, Tyres and Brakes => Topic started by: Andre Jute on June 05, 2017, 12:57:12 am

Title: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Andre Jute on June 05, 2017, 12:57:12 am
Why the Magura HSxx hydraulic rim brakes are the very best brakes for a tourer, a commuter, a utility biker

I'm not keen on bicycle disc brakes of the standard type that fit to the hub. I find them uncontrollable and grimly demanding of attention if you don't want them to plant you on your on face on the unyielding tarmac. As an aside, even that function powerful modern roller brakes from Shimano performs more smoothly, less expensively, and with less maintenance. But for a tourer or a commuter, who wants low-stress brakes, both kinds demand too much concentration and attention.

Rim brakes are generally smoother and less demanding of attention in operation and maintenance in extended use.

Your standard cable-operated rim brake is in fact a low-stress disc brake, with the entire rim of the wheel as its disc. It is a component proven good enough by time. But "good enough" is the enemy of the best. It comes as no surprise, to me at least, that the thoughtful cyclist can do better still.

If you lust after hydraulic discs, and your bicycle's fork and rear triangle don't have fittings for them, there's a really fine touring hydraulic disc brake that bolts straight on to rim brake fitments. It is the Magura HS11, HS22 and HS33, so here's three pages of currently catalogued Magura HS hydraulic rim brakes in touring and urban, trail and high-power versions, in singles, sets, more complete (easy-fit) sets, with service and replacement parts (you can leave them off -- in 10000km I haven't touched any of the spares and maintenance bits I bought).
https://www.bike-components.de/de/s/?keywords=Maura%20HS (https://www.bike-components.de/de/s/?keywords=Maura%20HS)
Voila, the best disc brakes for tourers, ever!

(http://www.magura.com/media/2705/647x559__0024_hs22_01.png)
Magura HS22 hydraulic rim brake for touring and urban bicycles

BTW, my ten-year-old HS11 were chosen because they were less powerful than the alternative HS33 and therefore more progressive; the last thing a tourer wants when he is fatigued after a long day in the saddle is brakes that require conscious attention every time you apply them, under threat of a face-plant. The difference was in the size of the oil pressure chamber, larger and thus at lower pressure in the HS11 than the HS33. However, these days the HS11 and HS33 (and presumably the HS22 too) are operationally all the same, differing merely in cosmetics and fitting possibilities, though an external upside-down U-brace is available to stiffen the top of the fork above the caliper mounts and thereby stiffen up brake-response -- and thus make it more sudden. I have the brace -- in a box under a workbench, not on my bike, because it creates exactly the sort of attention-demanding brake response I hated on hub-centre discs and the best of the roller brakes. As you've gathered, I think you should leave the testosterone parked elsewhere when specifying the brakes on your bike, and in this regard the Magura HS system offers you the widest possibilities to tailor the response curve of any braking system known to me.

I have had all sorts of standard rim brakes, hub-fit discs both cable and hydraulic (both of them a PITA because they chewed pads at a rate of knots), roller discs both ancient and new (Shimano's IM70 series is superior to most, possibly all, of its disc brakes, but too sudden and too powerful for a commuter or tourer) -- and I have no hesitation in naming the Magura HSxx hydraulic rim brakes as the very best brakes for a tourer, a commuter, a utility biker, not only for the way they operate so smoothly and progressively and powerfully and securely, but because they are a fit and forget installation, self-adjusting, zero bleeding, zero service (the oil is sealed in for life, which appears to be indefinite, the fluid impervious to water), and my 10k brake blocks appear good to go that far again, perhaps twice that far.

© Andre Jute 2017
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: John Saxby on June 05, 2017, 02:41:55 am
Thanks, Andre. I know about Magura from my motorcycling days half-century, and the name is synonymous with quality.  But...it appears that Magura don't make a version to fit drop bars, so I'll have to watch from afar. 
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 05, 2017, 02:32:52 pm
On a bike tour working on my bike in a campground, I would much rather be stringing my new inner cable (pulled from my spares) than trying to fix a hydraulic system.  I might have to tape up the excess length of cable with some electrical tape because I do not carry a good cable cutter, but at least it is something that will get me rolling again.  If I pass a bike shop later, I am sure I could get the cable end cut.

And I can't imagine anything worse than dealing with hydraulics when re-assembling my S&S coupled bike.

On my Nomad I am running some long arm low budget Tektro V brakes with S&S adapters, I needed these low budget ones to clear my fenders because the XT brakes did not have the arm length I needed for the wide fenders over my 57 mm tires.

First photo is the inexpensive Tektro after I installed it on the rear, second photo shows the XT on the front (that was later replaced) and how the cable rubs on the fender.  In both cases I am using a travel agent to allow me to use brake levers with the "road" brake type of cable pull.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: John Saxby on June 05, 2017, 06:02:41 pm
I use Tektro brake levers with my Shim Deore V-brakes. Both components are in the "unfashionable" budget range, as the British newspapers describe football clubs from grimy parts. They work very well, esp with Koolstop salmon pads (which are very fashionable indeed, even when grimy.) 

Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: lewis noble on June 05, 2017, 09:04:22 pm
Hello Mickeg . . . Working on a notsosmart phone at present, so difficult to see detail in pictures. (Been cycling in N W Scotland, of which more when I get home). But what is the wheel type device, cable feeder or whatever, on the left side / cable entry side of the pictures? My Sherpa has XT  rim brakes, worked fine on a descent of Bealach na Ba. More about the ascent in a few days time!

Lewis
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 06, 2017, 01:05:03 am
Hello Mickeg . . . Working on a notsosmart phone at present, so difficult to see detail in pictures. (Been cycling in N W Scotland, of which more when I get home). But what is the wheel type device, cable feeder or whatever, on the left side / cable entry side of the pictures? My Sherpa has XT  rim brakes, worked fine on a descent of Bealach na Ba. More about the ascent in a few days time!

Lewis

That is a Travel Agent.  It allows you to use V brakes with conventional road type brake levers.  I use drop bars and have conventional road brake levers.
http://problemsolversbike.com/products/brakes/travel_agents_-_6416

Available with or without cable adjusters and available in silver or black.

I also use one on my latest touring bike build, this photo shows one without the cable adjuster.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Andre Jute on June 06, 2017, 11:19:09 am
On a bike tour working on my bike in a campground, I would much rather be stringing my new inner cable (pulled from my spares) than trying to fix a hydraulic system.  I might have to tape up the excess length of cable with some electrical tape because I do not carry a good cable cutter, but at least it is something that will get me rolling again.  If I pass a bike shop later, I am sure I could get the cable end cut.

Why on earth should you ever want to do all of that? Are you perhaps mistaking the HSxx rim hydraulic brake system from Magura for one of their needie-bleedie, pad-chewing hub-mount hydraulic disc systems for macho men? The Magura HSxx system consists of easy-fit, easy remove grips and calipers permanently joined for life, which by all accounts is indefinite, probably permanent, by a tube that you never remove or open because the system is never bled and never requires topping up (it is totally sealed and the "oil" is totally insensitive to water). The HSxx is distinguished from all other hydraulic braking systems by fitting the calipers on the forks at the wheel rims and applying the brake blocks to the rims.

And I can't imagine anything worse than dealing with hydraulics when re-assembling my S&S coupled bike.

That's exactly my point! I've chosen this zero-maintenance, zero-risk system because you're not dealing with hydraulics: you're dealing with a sealed-for-life black box, in which is it immaterial to you what the gubbins are because you'll never have to deal with them. All you need to know is that they work better and last longer than the other rim brakes.

In the light of that, I have a hard time imagining anything easier with an S&S coupled bike than Magura S&S hydraulic rim brakes. Study the photographs in the link I published in the original post. I suppose you could use a wrench to remove the grip from the handlebar, but if it were me, I'd replace the bolts on the clamp with quick release knurled or plastic-topped screws. With one scew loosened and the other removed, remove the grip and screw the loose screw back in far enough not to be lost. You don't remove the tube from the grip. Now wrap the tube with the grip attached around the fork, leaving the calipers on the fork with the other end of the tube attached to them; the calipers fit to the inside of the fork blades which will protect them. That's it at the front.

For the rear brake, it is surely not beyond human ingenuity to arrange that the hydraulic fluid tube runs through a couple of clips (or through a reusable cable tie), so you unscrew the grip, pull it out of the clips forward of the S&S hinge, and wrap the whole around whichever part of the frame comes to hand. Again, you do not remove the tube from either the grip or the caliper end.

That should take about a minute for both brakes, if your bike is properly developed, and screwing the grips back on and clipping the rear cable into a single or perhaps two clips another minute. Max. Are your cable brakes faster to dismount and remount than that? Do they need adjustment after reassembly?

To forestall the next argument: If you can crush or abrade Magura's special HS hydraulic tube with any force your bike is reasonably likely to meet, I'll give you my spare set, and pay the postage too.

On my Nomad I am running some long arm low budget Tektro V brakes with S&S adapters, I needed these low budget ones to clear my fenders because the XT brakes did not have the arm length I needed for the wide fenders over my 57 mm tires.

You don't have to accept cheap brakes on your bike. I operate Magura's hydraulic rim brakes (HS11 -22 -33) on 32mm rims carrying 60mm Big Apple tires and SKS P65 mudguards. You don't get any wider than that on a touring bike. No problemo.

First photo is the inexpensive Tektro after I installed it on the rear, second photo shows the XT on the front (that was later replaced) and how the cable rubs on the fender.  In both cases I am using a travel agent to allow me to use brake levers with the "road" brake type of cable pull.

I love your bike, George, but you don't need these make-do stratagems like the Travel Agent when you can have a more efficient, less bothersome, cleaner and probably overall cheaper brake option which has proven bombproof-reliable. Not that I'm trying to persuade you of anything -- I suspect your mind is made -- but simply to answer your points.

Thanks for helping me see that the Magura rim hydraulics are also an elegant solution to problems that arrive in the wake of S&S knuckles and to fitting efficient brakes around fat tires and mudguards.

CAVEATS
Only one man's opinion, of course, in view of a decade of incident-free service by Magura HS brakes and the fact that it is pretty hard to find a contrary opinion on the net. These brakes have been marketed for decades in a very competitive sector of the market, and Magura gives a five-guarantee. However, they don't fit most Thorn bikes because the brake mounting bosses on those Thorn bikes are a bit higher than the norm, as explained by Dave from the Thorn Workshop below. Check before you start shopping!
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 06, 2017, 04:13:36 pm
I have some prior experience with hydraulics from prior work experience.  Nothing lasts forever, if it can fail it will fail at a most inopportune time.

Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Dave Whittle Thorn Workshop on June 07, 2017, 08:46:27 am
Just a word of warning, most Magura brakes don't fit Thorn bikes, to get the most mudguard clearance we position the V brake bosses as high as possible so that the block on the V brake is at the bottom of the slot, the problem is Magura HS series don't have the same vertical adjustment as V brakes so generally don't line up with the rim well enough.

I would be skeptical of basing any decision on one mans opinion too, Magura brakes aren't 100% reliable, they can leak, overheat, flip seals in the lever and they don't come off very well in a crash.

Just my 2p! 
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 07, 2017, 09:01:36 pm
Andre,

My (and John Saxby's and George's) preference for and use of drop handlebars mitigates against the ready use of the Maguras. The brake levers pictured on the model in your article are not directly compatible with drops.

If handlebar shape is a priority, then it is worth adaptations. For me, I need my hands with the palms largely facing each other to get the wrist, elbow, and shoulder comfort I need on 17-hour days in the saddle. The greater variety of hand positions becomes more critical over long riding days also -- moreso when weeks of such days are strung together without a break.

Dropping down to the lower part of my handlebars provided welcome relief from the headwinds I encountered the length of the Dutch coastline and on my desert tours. Drop 'bars are so essential to my riding, all my bikes are equipped with them.

The option just isn't there with the particular model shown unless I were to use a remote fluid reservoir, and then the lines would have to be unsealed and adapted. Also, handlebar tape makes it difficult to quickly remove and reinstall drop-bar brake levers.

Sads.

All the best,

Dan.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Andre Jute on June 08, 2017, 03:31:02 am
My (and John Saxby's and George's) preference for and use of drop handlebars mitigates against the ready use of the Maguras. The brake levers pictured on the model in your article are not directly compatible with drops.

Magura did once have a drop bar-specific rim hydraulic brake grip, in the HS66 set. But it seems they decided that once they split the grip's clamp, so that the bottom half comes off completely on two bolts, that the new design will also do for drop bars. If you study the photo I published, you will see that fitting the grips on drop bars shouldn't be a problem, and that the multifinger handle gives plenty of versatility in choosing your mounting point. (On the important prior assumption that Dave has highlighted, that the calipers fit your Thorn fork.) The versatility of the new HS grips was pointed out to me by an HS66 user eyeing the latest from Magure in case he ever has to replace his longserving brake set (already old when I got mine nearly ten years ago), so I removed a caveat ("doesn't fit drop bars") from my original. Apparently the current agitation among the drop bar radicals is for a 90 degree adaptor for the HS brakes so the fluid tube can go under the bar tape, and a streamlined hood mounting (1) for cyclocross and touring so we can all be fast.

(1) Rohloff is a bit behind the ball here. Maybe one of the aftermarket boutiques should build  a 90 degree geared knuckle to fit under the rotary control so the gear cables can be tidied along the handlebar together with the brake cables.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 08, 2017, 06:10:03 am
:: Some related discussion :: wrt drop-'bar Magura hydraulic braking here...
http://www.cxmagazine.com/tbt-magura-hydraulic-cantilever-brake-drop-bar-lever-hs66-hs77-rim

Best,

Dan.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: martinf on June 08, 2017, 06:35:57 am
My experience of disc brakes is limited to a few kms on a borrowed bike.

For my purposes I didn't see any real advantage over my current brakes, and I am with MickG in my distrust of hydraulics, though in my case it is down to unfamiliarity rather than experience, although I do remember my brother messing around with damaged brake hoses on some of his motorcycles.

I currently have V-brakes on my 3 Thorns, cantilevers on most of my old bikes, a mix of different calliper brakes (modern dual pivot and 1970's centrepulls) on wife's bike, Bromptons abd one of the visitor bikes, a drum brake on the rear wheel of one of the visitor bikes and a roller brake on the rear wheel of the other visitor bike.

All these brakes work adequately.

I haven't yet done enough mileage on the V-brakes to really evaluate them, but I suspect pad life may be less than on my old cantis.

Currently my two favourites are:

- cantilever, with a preference for the old 1970's and early 1980's models with wide arms that stick out, rather than the more recent but still old "low-profile" designs. I have done any tens of thousands of kms on these brakes with minimal maintenance, mainly limited to regular brake pad replacement and occasional regreasing of the pivots and main cable/housing replacement, the straddle cables are nearly all original. I also like the simplicity of cantilevers.

- drum. Sealed, so clean and unaffected by rain, pads last for tens of thousands of kms. Not harsh, like my very limited experience of discs. But rather heavy and with limited gear options.

Not very fond of the roller brake, but mine is a fairly old model, newer ones may be better.

Callipers work OK, but need significantly more maintenance than cantis, and the ones I have don't last so long. All my calliper brakes have plastic sleeve bearings that wear out and introduce play, whereas the cantis all have yellow-metal bearings that run for tens of thousands of kms without much wear
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 08, 2017, 05:37:32 pm
...
I haven't yet done enough mileage on the V-brakes to really evaluate them, but I suspect pad life may be less than on my old cantis.

Currently my two favourites are:

- cantilever, with a preference for the old 1970's and early 1980's models with wide arms that stick out, rather than the more recent but still old "low-profile" designs. I have done any tens of thousands of kms on these brakes with minimal maintenance, mainly limited to regular brake pad replacement and occasional regreasing of the pivots and main cable/housing replacement, the straddle cables are nearly all original. I also like the simplicity of cantilevers.

- drum. Sealed, so clean and unaffected by rain, pads last for tens of thousands of kms. Not harsh, like my very limited experience of discs. But rather heavy and with limited gear options.
...

I have used just about every kind of rim brake, a small sample of drum brakes, a disc on one wheel for about 500 miles, and as a kid I used coaster brakes.  I am going to refrain from comparing canti vs V vs sidepulls, vs centerpulls, as I think the are all quite similar, the main difference is how well they are set up and the quality of the pads used and the material the rim is constructed from. 

My favorite brakes are rim brakes on CSS rims.  My CSS rim brakes are not yet worn as much as others on this forum that have commented about problems stopping with wet rims.  Mine at times I think are worn to the point of being equivalent to average non-CSS rim brakes.  But, then I get on a bike with non-CSS rim brakes and I suddenly am surprised how good my CSS rim brakes still are.  I use Koolstop CSS pads.  If my CSS rim brakes got to the point that they were problematic in the wet (as commented by others), I would be tempted to try a softer brake pad instead of continuing to use a CSS specific pad.

Disc vs rim brakes.
  Disclaimer:  I only have about 500 miles of experience with a disc.  My latest new build has a frame that is disc only, I fitted a fork to that frame with canti brake posts.  This was my first disc, so I spent some quality time on google searches looking for brake reviews.  The BB7 appeared to be an old favorite, but TRP Spyre was a new one that is gaining more and more fans.  I bought the TRP Spyre 160mm (rear), they strongly recommended compression-less brake housing which I used (Aztec brand).  On this bike I am using XT V brake with travel agent in the front, and Koolstop Salmon pads (in part based on recommendation from Dan) on Dyad rim.  My observation with this bike is unique in that I can compare the TRP Spyre disc on rear and V brake (salmon Koolstop on Dyad) in the front.  I find that my disc and rim brake are almost identical in the dry.  But the one thing that I really noticed is for hard braking where I needed to decelerate more than typical, the V brake worked better than the disc in dry conditions, the disc appeared to have an upper limit for how much braking power it has.  I did not brake hard enough to break the tire loose from the pavement (skid), thus I think my comments on disc vs rim brake is not due to one being in the front and one being in the rear.  Wet riding, the disc clearly outperforms.  That said, these opinions on disc vs rim are based on only 500 miles (~800 km), so my opinion may change.

Since the TRP Spyre is pretty new, I attached two photos.  It is a cable operated brake, the pads on both sides move inwards to the disc instead of only one side.  I got the Spyre from SJS so I know they stock them. 

If anyone that really loves hydraulics was interested, TRP also makes a hydraulic brake unit that is cable operated. 
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Pavel on June 08, 2017, 06:25:48 pm
mickeg ... on which bike is that.  IT seems a very different location for the brakes compared to most  mounts and the Thorn way of it. The cable routing seems a bit strained but otherwise seems to be well thought out for rack clearance. Any thoughts with respect to the mounting location on the frame?

Is that Titanium?  If "steel is real" does that mean titanium is unreal?  ;)
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 08, 2017, 06:45:10 pm
Very helpful comparison, George.
Quote
But the one thing that I really noticed is for hard braking where I needed to decelerate more than typical, the V brake worked better than the disc in dry conditions, the disc appeared to have an upper limit for how much braking power it has.  I did not brake hard enough to break the tire loose from the pavement (skid), thus I think my comments on disc vs rim brake is not due to one being in the front and one being in the rear.
Well, sure...weight transfer has a direct effect on braking limits, so this may seem to amplify the power of the v-brake (it being on the front and less likely to lose ground traction) versus the more lightly loaded rear disc (which will tend to lift under braking). However, I sense you mean the ultimate clamping force by the disc is not as high as the clamping force of the v-brake on the rim-disc? I'm really interested here. :)

In a slightly different vein, one of my randonneur bikes employs centerpull calipers mounted to brazed-on mounts. There's minimal flex in the arms between pads and mounts and it works well. Three of my bikes use various front and rear editions of the Scott/Pedersen SE and SunTour variants of the self-energizing helix-pivot cantilever. The pivot mounts are fixed and the canti arms rotate forward on a helix as they travel inward. They can be very fussy to setup (Scott/Pedersens) or easy (SunTours), but are really intriguing because the forward motion of the rim moves them inward to a degree once the pad makes contact. I chose them to ease hand pressure when braking with heavy loads and they surely do that, working well on loaded touring singles as well as my tandem. I like them very much, but they are an acquired taste and do require some rider adaptation compared to standard brakes with no helix.

I am about to convert my tandem from these SE brakes to v-brakes for a different reason. I took a spill on the bike last fall and though my hand served as a cushion between the pavement and the lever body, I still managed to crack the (1984 vintage Dia-Compe Aero Gran Compe) lever body. Instead of replacing it with another lever from my backstock, I am going with a Tektro RL520 for better *hand* leverage/geometry...the hood is longer, the lever blade is cranked, and I can grasp it with four fingers from atop the hood. Yes, the same lever is available for cantilevers, but this was a good excuse to compare a v-brake setup to the SEs and will be a fun experiment and far faster to setup. I'm not sure if net braking power at the rim will be similar with the identical Kool-Stop Salmon pads or will simply feel better at my hands.

The tandem uses a massive Arai drum brake on the rear wheel, actuated by a bar-end shifter to serve as a drag brake to limit top speed when coasting downhill. It is very effective in tat role (and can glow red at night after heavy braking!) and limits speeds to a point where the rim brakes can easily retard progress with the weight of two people, a full touring load and a loaded trailer. Without, it is easy to top 102kmh/63mph coasting downhill. With the drag brake set, speeds are limited to about 68kmh/42mph on the same hills. When I got the bike the drum brake was setup as a regular brake, the other lever controlled both front and rear cantilevers; I found this too limiting. The drag brake on the rear did not provide sufficient braking when serving in that role and operating both cantilevers with one lever required careful balancing of cable tension and rarely gave a good result. The present arrangement of a barcon-operated drum drag brake and separate levers for front and rear cantis has been ideal.

Best,

Dan.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 08, 2017, 06:55:05 pm
mickeg ... on which bike is that.  IT seems a very different location for the brakes compared to most  mounts and the Thorn way of it. The cable routing seems a bit strained but otherwise seems to be well thought out for rack clearance. Any thoughts with respect to the mounting location on the frame?

Is that Titanium?  If "steel is real" does that mean titanium is unreal?  ;)

I think Dan does not like it to sound like we are pitching a non-Thorn bike so I am not going to name it here, I will send you a private message.  Yes, Titanium.  I think it is real enough.  The brake mount on the chainstay is unusual, that company does it the more conventional way (on the seatstays) on their other models.  But I think they did it this way on this model as it is a touring model so a rack mount that will not interfere with the disc brake unit is more important for touring where a good rack is needed.  The brake mount is bolted to the frame with three bolts, they can also fit a flat mount instead of a post mount this way.  The cable does not seem strained when I strung the cable, but they used to mount the cable clips above the chainstay and more recently they moved it below the chainstay on the one they shipped to me, I suspect that the cable will be more direct if the flat mount brake is used. 

I am not getting rid of my Thorns, I got a great price on this frame so I bought it to see what a Titanium bike is like.  I did a 5 day short tour near home to test it, I like the new bike, so now I have three touring bikes along with the Sherpa and Nomad.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 08, 2017, 07:01:56 pm
Very helpful comparison, George.
Quote
But the one thing that I really noticed is for hard braking where I needed to decelerate more than typical, the V brake worked better than the disc in dry conditions, the disc appeared to have an upper limit for how much braking power it has.  I did not brake hard enough to break the tire loose from the pavement (skid), thus I think my comments on disc vs rim brake is not due to one being in the front and one being in the rear.
Well, sure...weight transfer has a direct effect on braking limits, so this may seem to amplify the power of the v-brake (it being on the front and less likely to lose ground traction) versus the more lightly loaded rear disc (which will tend to lift under braking). However, I sense you mean the ultimate clamping force by the disc is not as high as the clamping force of the v-brake on the rim-disc? I'm really interested here. :)
...

I am pretty sure that the TRP Spyre with more and more clamping pressure did not provide that much more stopping power, in other words not really linear.

Without panniers, I could cause a skid in rear, but with a touring load I do not think I could cause a skid.  Maybe the front Salmon pads were that much better?

I used the stock TRP disc pads and disc.  Being my first disc brake, I was careful to run in the brakes as described in the manufacturers literature.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: martinf on June 08, 2017, 07:50:24 pm
The tandem uses a massive Arai drum brake on the rear wheel, actuated by a bar-end shifter to serve as a drag brake to limit top speed when coasting downhill. It is very effective in tat role (and can glow red at night after heavy braking!) and limits speeds to a point where the rim brakes can easily retard progress with the weight of two people, a full touring load and a loaded trailer. Without, it is easy to top 102kmh/63mph coasting downhill. With the drag brake set, speeds are limited to about 68kmh/42mph on the same hills. When I got the bike the drum brake was setup as a regular brake, the other lever controlled both front and rear cantilevers; I found this too limiting. The drag brake on the rear did not provide sufficient braking when serving in that role and operating both cantilevers with one lever required careful balancing of cable tension and rarely gave a good result. The present arrangement of a barcon-operated drum drag brake and separate levers for front and rear cantis has been ideal.

I had a tandem, bought second hand but nearly unused, which I kept from about 1980 to about 1990. It originally had front and rear Mafac cantilevers operated from a single brake lever, plus an Atom drum brake as used on French mopeds of the same vintage, operated from the other lever.

Like Dan, I disliked the two brakes on one lever arrangement, so changed to seperate brake levers for the cantis, and controlled the drum with a Suntour rachet-type thumbshifter that I fitted under the top part of the drop handlebars. This method of braking reminded my of the Telma electromagnetic retarder system fitted on some of the buses and coaches I drove at that time - the Telma was controlled by a slim rod under the steering wheel. Unlike most brakes, both these systems require you to remove the braking force with a definite action rather than just releasing foot or hand pressure.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 08, 2017, 09:55:56 pm
Quote
I am pretty sure that the TRP Spyre with more and more clamping pressure did not provide that much more stopping power, in other words not really linear.

Without panniers, I could cause a skid in rear, but with a touring load I do not think I could cause a skid.  Maybe the front Salmon pads were that much better?

I used the stock TRP disc pads and disc.  Being my first disc brake, I was careful to run in the brakes as described in the manufacturers literature.
Thanks for this, George; just what I was hoping for (not necessarily results, but the information). :)
=====
One thing lacking in the braking discussion is rim composition. I've touched on it before, but rims meeting the definition of "6061 aluminum" have some variation in composition, the key ingredient being silicon (sand) content. Rims with little will be "softer" and tend to load pads with worn aluminum; aluminum on aluminum stops poorly. I went through this with some older Araya 16A(3), 16(A)5, and 20A rims. Started out well, but once the surface anodizing wore off, they were deadly with even Kool-Stop Salmon pads. I could clean the sidewalls with steel wool, rinse, and then more aluminum would transfer to my thumb when I rubbed the sidewalls. There seemed to be no end to it except for swapping to a different brand rim with a slightly different composition. Those with more silicon content are harder and tend to be more long wearing and stop better 'cos they don't load the pads with aluminum. Of course I am talking about the base extrusion after the surface treatment -- whether anodized, hard-anodized (there are different degrees of surface hardening depending on the anodizing process) or CSS or ceramic treated -- wears off. If the rims are only polished or soft (cosmetic) anodized, one can get into the base metal pretty quickly. If the rim itself is fairly soft, it won't stop so well as a harder rim with rim brakes, regardless of brake design or pad compound.

All the best,

Dan.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 09, 2017, 12:08:34 am
...
One thing lacking in the braking discussion is rim composition. I've touched on it before, but rims meeting the definition of "6061 aluminum" have some variation in composition, the key ingredient being silicon (sand) content. Rims with little will be "softer" and tend to load pads with worn aluminum; aluminum on aluminum stops poorly. I went through this with some older Araya 16A(3), 16(A)5, and 20A rims. Started out well, but once the surface anodizing wore off, they were deadly with even Kool-Stop Salmon pads. I could clean the sidewalls with steel wool, rinse, and then more aluminum would transfer to my thumb when I rubbed the sidewalls. There seemed to be no end to it except for swapping to a different brand rim with a slightly different composition. Those with more silicon content are harder and tend to be more long wearing and stop better 'cos they don't load the pads with aluminum. Of course I am talking about the base extrusion after the surface treatment -- whether anodized, hard-anodized (there are different degrees of surface hardening depending on the anodizing process) or CSS or ceramic treated -- wears off. If the rims are only polished or soft (cosmetic) anodized, one can get into the base metal pretty quickly. If the rim itself is fairly soft, it won't stop so well as a harder rim with rim brakes, regardless of brake design or pad compound.

All the best,

Dan.

I am largely ignorant of the alloys.  But I can say that Aluminum will readily oxidize when a fresh surface is exposed to oxygen, so you will always have some gray Aluminum oxide dust on your hands when you handle a used rim.

Aluminum oxide is much harder than non-oxidized Aluminum.  Aluminum oxide makes great grinding tools for cutting steel, etc.  I occasionally get out an emory board (a stiff piece of cardboard with sand paper like sides) and try to clean off the Aluminum oxide from my brake pads, my thinking is that brake pads are cheaper than rims.  I do not know if this extends the life of a rim or not, but I continue to do it occasionally.  And because pads are cheaper than rims, I do not clean any metal off my rims, only off my pads.

I am always amazed that I can handle my CSS rims and not get any Aluminum oxide on my hands like I would with regular rims.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Andre Jute on June 09, 2017, 09:13:03 am
Not very fond of the roller brake, but mine is a fairly old model, newer ones may be better.

Heh-heh. Newer ones will do better, all right: they'll throw you over the handlebar for the slightest lapse in attention.

I have two Shimano types, an IM-41 on the rear of the Gazelle Toulouse which has a hub-mounted front disc, and IM-70 rollers front and rear on my Trek Smover. They're chalk and cheese.

Shimano's IM-41 roller brake is basically useless, but on slippery roads acts as a sort of anti-skid brake with the nasty, cheap, unprogressive Shimano front disc Gazelle fitted; this disc brake progresses from semi-useless to a dead lock face plant in about a eighth of an inch of movement.

Shimano's IM-70, by contrast, leaves any hydraulic or rim brake I know for dead for clamping force. Whatever friction there is between your tyres and the road surface, which is what really determines braking capability, the IM-70 will find. The problem is that the IM-70 is like riding a tiger: it wants you to fall off so that it can eat you. You have to pay constant close attention to gentling the brakes just so, or a nasty rider-error incident awaits you; the faster you go -- and some of my downhills are very fast indeed -- the more acute the problem becomes. I don't pay out good money to be bullied by components. As soon as I could, I switched over to Magura's HS-11 rim hydraulics, which are very progressive.

All the same, at least theoretically, roller brakes have it over all other brakes, supposedly offering all the advantages of both drums and discs, and none of the disadvantages of drums, discs or rim brakes -- except that Shimano has failed in its efforts to make them anything but either limp or overbearing. Oh, and one more thing, they whine (literally in the case of the noisy IM-75) for service, which consists of squirting in a sticky, staining, viscous black fluid through a little nipple for which the twee rubber plug falls out on the road and then is difficult to source for replacement, and expensive in postage for a thruppenny component.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Andre Jute on June 09, 2017, 11:00:31 am
SOME FUNDAMENTAL THOUGHTS ON TANDEM BRAKES

The friction between any particular bicycle's tyres and the road surface determines braking capability, no exceptions.  Beyond a certain effective level, the clamping force the brakes, whatever kind they are, can exert becomes irrelevant because the coefficient of retardation is determined at the tyre patch on the road, not at the brake interface. At bicycle speeds aerodynamic resistance aiding braking is rarely a significant factor. A particular bicycle's loaded mass and velocity are the other important factors in determining braking requirements, which is why this subject arises so often in discussion of tandem brakes.

Heat dissipation is another problem altogether. Heat dissipation won't be improved by increasing brake clamping force.

It seems to me likely that overheating brakes on tandems are caused by trying to make components designed to be lightweight (which is almost every bicycle component) do heavyweight duty.

I've wondered every time I saw a tandem, why people trying to fix a tandem's inherent problems don't start work much more fundamentally, at making sure the fork of the tandem will take a very fat tyre of very grippy material, because if you don't, nothing, but nothing you do will help until you fix the braking coefficient to match the greater weight of the fully loaded tandem. Anything else will be undermined by the fact that most tandems are just long-wheelbase, double- or triple-loaded road bikes given a light dusting of slightly more capable components which do virtually nothing to fix the fundamental problems caused by greater mass and greater velocity-potential on inadequate tyres. But a more effective tyre-road interface will give you better braking, in turn requiring lower clamping forces, less energy uselessly turned into heat and decreasing braking efficiency and requiring dissipation.

Another way of looking at it is that whatever you do to improve tandem braking will add weight to the bike, and the most effective weight, in adding comfort and stopping power, will be wider tyres and the wider rims you fit them to.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 09, 2017, 05:11:01 pm
Not a counterpoint but some thoughts on your above, Andre...

I don't really have a problem braking my tandem with the self-energizing rim brakes and Kool-Stop salmon pads I am using...until speeds top ~72kmh/42mph. The barcon-actuated big Arai drum-drag brake simply keeps speeds to 72kmh and below, where the rim brakes are most effective.

Even so, I have hauled the bike down in amazingly short distances from 100kmh -- once, because overheating prevents a second go till everything cools down again. Jack (Dad) and I were booming down Chambers Hill here in Eugene, topping 101kmh when the traffic light at the bottom turned red shortly before we approached it. Despite seeing then 87 year-old stoker Jack in my rearview mirror, arm waving "go faster", I didn't figure we could make it through the intersection against the light before the cars waiting at it turned. Being pilot/captain, I could see better and was right. To be honest, I didn't even think of the drag brake and simply squeezed the blood out of my knuckles to actuate the rim cantis. Don't forget the magic ingredient of adrenaline in the braking mix! I do recall Jack yelping when the backs of his legs caught some melted brake pad, but the pads were far from gone after that one panic-fueled stop.

Some factors often overlooked by non-tandemists in braking discussions are a) the long wheelbase, which allows front braking at levels that would cause an endo on single bikes and b) the weight on the rear, which more heavily loads the rear tire and ups the level where it would break away in a skid. Of course, all this assumes reasonably fresh, grippy tires on good tarmac to maximize the friction coefficient between tire and pavement. All bets are off when it comes to downhill braking on gravel logging roads, but I can assure you it is possible to drift a fully loaded tandem with well-built wheels on soft surfaces and so scrub off speed on poor road surfaces. My stokers might disagree in principle -- and certainly in advance -- but have been grateful After.

It also helps to have minimal slop in the braking system which includes the frame. My tandem has massive tubing cross-sections, and I brazed a tubular cromoly brake booster for the front and tied it into the crown of the massive unicrown fork. I've ridden the bike solo on any number of 200km day rides, and though it feels a bit stiff up front, the ride is remarkably good due to being suspended well inside the long wheelbase.

All pretense of "good" braking goes right out the window when ridden solo and that is exactly the situation where I find myself shy on tire cross-section. Under heavy braking that would endo a single bike, the tandem ridden solo simply locks up the front tire and plows resolutely forward. I really can't use the drag brake at the rear without causing a skid due to the easy breakaway of the lightly loaded rear tire and the same for the rim-mounted brakes which also cause easy breakaway of the tire contact patch.

It was just this situation that resulted in a sad loss of life several years ago when a husband/captain rode a couple's tandem solo down a local pass to get the car for his exhausted wife/stoker. He "turned up missing" as the odd phrase goes, and a search was convened. He was found at the bottom of a ravine. Analysis of the skid marks determined the crash was caused by excess speed and poor handling...weight distribution was off without the stoker, speed was too high, and tire-pavement friction coefficient was insufficient for good braking/cornering and off he flew, with tragic results.

Most of my tandem day-touring is done on 26x1.5in road slicks. Oddly enough (especially given the overall weight of tandem with riders), they work fine and are remarkably comfortable and durable. When my Dutch pal came over for a tour, we took the bike with these tires up into the lower reaches of June Mountain on logging roads, fully loaded and towing a trailer. All-up weight with both of us and the very heavy Dutch Army tank driver's boots he brought for hiking was right at 272kg/600lb. My Danneauxbuilt trailer alone weighed  57kg/125lb fully loaded with food and lots of water (heavy in itself) for our dry camps. No real problem braking on 10% downgrades provided we kept the speed limited with the drag brake...it also proved up to the job as we descended past the Layng Creek Fossil Beds. On last Fall's tour through the Coast Range, I swapped in a 26x2.0 Schwalbe Dureme at the rear. The bike has clearance for *much* wider tires, but so far these have had no real shortcomings.

I have to admit, compared to my single bikes all expectations wrt to braking and tire cross section on a tandem carrying two people with or without luggage seem to be thrown out the window in practice and have gone counter to all I would have predicted. Biggest reason for the impending swap from self-energizing cantis to v-brakes is simply to try something new and to have a deeper perch for my hands and better leverage/comfort when riding atop the brake hoods. This change is a chance to play and compare, never a bad thing. If results are worse, I'll simply switch back.

You may find these links interesting:
http://santanatandems.com/Techno/UnderstandingBraking.html
http://www.precisiontandems.com/arai.htm
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/tandem-brakes.html
For those pining for a replacement Arai drum brake (no longer manufactured), a machinist local to me is offering a replacement in the Tom Maddox Machine "Mad Dog Drag Brake", described here: https://tandemgeek.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/next-generation-drag-brake-now-available/

I'll end my tandem ramblings here, or the topic may veer enough to be split and moved to the Tandem Talk board:
http://thorncyclesforum.co.uk/index.php?board=24.0

All the best,

Dan.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: martinf on June 09, 2017, 08:48:51 pm
With Dan on tandem braking. The extra weight seems to help braking. I had reasonably wide 650B x 44 tyres on mine. After I had replaced the fairly useless Mafac brake pads that came with the bike with decent ones (Scott-Mathauser) the Mafac cantilevers were quite effective enough to stop the bike quickly in an emergency and I never experienced any skidding or loss of traction.

The drum brake was useful to limit speed on long descents, without having to worry about rim heating and possible tyre blowoff.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: mickeg on June 09, 2017, 10:05:40 pm
In a previous post I had a couple photos of my rear disc brake unit mounted on the chainstay.  A question was asked about the cable routing, I have cropped another photo to show the cable rounting better.  The bends in the cable are not a problem, it works just fine.  And here I get to show off a 20 year old derailleur that was in good enough shape to go on my new build.
Title: Re: Disc brakes without disc brake braze-ons, plus a wide choice of response curves
Post by: Danneaux on June 09, 2017, 10:57:22 pm
All lovely, George!

Best,

Dan.